d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Guild Chat & Recruiting > The Dark Tavern > Guild Chat Thread
Prev1407408409410411554Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,656
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 440.00
Jan 20 2010 03:19am
Interesting Shane (previous post) :)
First however - lets get this 'Top 3' rule effective - Yazz please elaborate on how to propose this and how would we incoporate it? :)
Member
Posts: 67,583
Joined: Jun 4 2008
Gold: 2.25
Jan 20 2010 03:20am
Quote (Darkken @ Jan 20 2010 04:19am)
Interesting Shane (previous post)  :)
First however - lets get this 'Top 3' rule effective - Yazz please elaborate on how to propose this and how would we incoporate it?  :)


mah druids #1 :)
no but seriously sry for posten im goin to bed, night everyone :)
Member
Posts: 3,656
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 440.00
Jan 20 2010 03:21am
BTW, was it me or did JSP take a giant shit for a moment? :blink:
Member
Posts: 3,656
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 440.00
Jan 20 2010 03:21am
Quote (Riki @ Jan 20 2010 04:20am)
mah druids #1 :)
no but seriously sry for posten im goin to bed, night everyone :)


Good Night Devon - sleep well :zzz:
Member
Posts: 3,656
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 440.00
Jan 20 2010 03:24am
How would this fully work and where do we incorprate it?

We could call it the Top 3 rule: Top 3 spots have to challenge 1 ahead and only #3 can challenge #2...(only #2 can challenge #1)
*This would mean that #4 cant challenge for #2, but #'s 4 and 5 can challenge for #3.
Member
Posts: 730
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 1,078.66
Jan 20 2010 03:26am
Quote (Darkken @ Jan 20 2010 04:21am)
BTW, was it me or did JSP take a giant shit for a moment? :blink:


Yes it did take a dump my little :angel:

Here is my proposed amendment to our challenging system:

Top 3 rule: Top 3 spots have to challenge 1 ahead and only #3 can challenge #2...(only #2 can challenge #1)

*This would mean that #4 cant challenge for #2, but #'s 4 and 5 can challenge for #3. And so on down the ladder as normal.
Most of the Ik barbs have already noticed how close all our duels have been. I feel this rule would add a little stability to the top
of the ladder and provide a more "clear path" to #1. Lets face it.... #1 loosing to #3 and not being able to re-challenge for the #1 spot sucks....


Im open for more ideas and opinions on this one.... just keep things civil..... :flamethrower:
Member
Posts: 3,656
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 440.00
Jan 20 2010 03:27am
I like it! :bouncy:
Shane let us know what you think about this?
:)
Member
Posts: 23,396
Joined: Aug 8 2006
Gold: 559.34
Jan 20 2010 03:28am
Quote (Darkken @ Jan 20 2010 05:21am)
BTW, was it me or did JSP take a giant shit for a moment? :blink:


this happens to me from time to time. its weird nothing will load, it say cant connect (yet everyhting music and all runs fine) i think its like LS refreshing or somthing lol..

As for the Top 3 idea. id like to here yazzs thoughts before i spring up any more ideas since yazz has ladder experience.
my one sugestion is.. if you lose a duel.. you should have 24 hours before dueling agian.. wether challanged or challanging.(it may be like this and i may be confused) the winner would be able to continue.. now i see stales if number 2 loses to number 3 and hes number 3 number 4 has to wait 24 hours before he can chalange number 3 for the spot.. giving number 3 a chance to take in the last duel before being slapped around agian.

:P


Quote (Yazz @ Jan 20 2010 05:26am)
Yes it did take a dump my little :angel:

Here is my proposed amendment to our challenging system:

Top 3 rule: Top 3 spots have to challenge 1 ahead and only #3 can challenge #2...(only #2 can challenge #1)

*This would mean that #4 cant challenge for #2, but #'s 4 and 5 can challenge for #3. And so on down the ladder as normal.
Most of the Ik barbs have already noticed how close all our duels have been. I feel this rule would add a little stability to the top
of the ladder and provide a more "clear path" to #1. Lets face it.... #1 loosing to #3 and not being able to re-challenge for the #1 spot sucks....


Im open for more ideas and opinions on this one.... just keep things civil..... :flamethrower:


I like. adding on to above.( meaning what drac asked)

This post was edited by Grimdayz on Jan 20 2010 03:30am
Member
Posts: 3,656
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 440.00
Jan 20 2010 03:34am
Ok, should we make it 12 hours? The point is to let lower ranked Barbs get a chance to challenge. If we dont limit them somehow, then as soon as #2 loses they could re-issue the challenge denying #3 a chance at it, your thoughts?
Member
Posts: 23,396
Joined: Aug 8 2006
Gold: 559.34
Jan 20 2010 03:36am
Quote (Darkken @ Jan 20 2010 05:34am)
Ok, should we make it 12 hours? The point is to let lower ranked Barbs get a chance to challenge. If we dont limit them somehow, then as soon as #2 loses they could re-issue the challenge denying #3 a chance at it, your thoughts?


ya my attmept is not to hold anyone back from openly dueling ofc..

i do like the top 3 idea.. a lot seems very effective and seems like it would let people really know whats up.. i got Bob and Jim to beat before i can gof or number 1 or w.e ya know,i do i like that.

The time thing i guess is not a bigg issue right now it seems more issmatic b.c the ladder and all the chars are new.. i know this is causeing some conflicts as well being not many of us know the IK set in and out well enough yet to make the just right build :D
Go Back To Guild Chat & Recruiting Topic List
Prev1407408409410411554Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll