Quote (Swiss_Army @ Tue, Sep 29 2009, 11:04am)

Hm... I'm not 100% sure on this one, but the way the ladder is looking at the moment (Steve#3, Steve#4) makes me want to say yes.

Your zealer will be able to jump straight to uqbar98 (you can't duel yourself, no?) which contradicts rules #2. This method can be used to "sling shot" past tough matchups and still attain #1.

Hypothetical Example:

Ladder standings are...

1.Dax
2.Krom
3.Steve Zeal
4.Steve Conc

Let's say that for some reason steve can't beat krom with his zealer after several attemtps, but he really wants to move up. He knows that he can beat him with his conc barb however, so he wins that matchup and moves up.

New standings:

1.Dax
2.Steve Conc
3.Steve Zeal
4.Krom

Now Steve's Zeal is free to take on Dax via "sling shot" due to his conc barb's new placement.

I've given this a little too much though I'm going to have to say Yes to the new rule #3

Quote (SirSteve1 @ Mon, Sep 28 2009, 10:30am)

a very long time ago I pulled my barb from Ladder because he was nearing the top and I expressed concerns about having 2 Chars on Ladder ... at the time almost everybody on Ladder siad it wasnt a Problem haveing 2 Chars on Ladder as long as they were a Dif Class. SO I put my Barb back on at the bottom and climbed up all over again.

Quote (SirSteve1 @ Mon, Sep 28 2009, 11:54am)

Anybody that watches this ladder knows that if the 2 New Rules I Suggested were already in Place It would Have made it alot harder for Me to Get 2 Chars in the top 4, Thats what Inspired me to come up with these new Rules It did seem a little unfair how easily I able to Accomplish it once I had been Motivated to do it.
(I was pissed cus everybody was picking on GMZ )
I think just approving the other 2 Rules would make it Alot hard to Acomplish in the Future.

Quote (SirSteve1 @ Tue, Sep 29 2009, 11:11am)

you can vote however you want OFC Siwss  but Implementing the first 2 rules woul elimnate your scenario

Quote (Swiss_Army @ Tue, Sep 29 2009, 11:15am)

Assuming that based the fact that you can't skip around in top 5? But how would you handle having the same user as #4 and #5? Would the #5 char simply not be able to move up?

Quote (Conc @ Tue, Sep 29 2009, 02:42am)

#3 didnt we try that once? lol
Imo as long as your active on both chars its fine to me. If your not going to be active then dont even put a second char of yours on ladder. Thats my opinion. So i vote yes its fine as long as your going to be active on both.

Quote (SirSteve1 @ Tue, Sep 29 2009, 11:23am)

the other guy would have to move up first which would leave the the lower ranked char open to being knocked down ....if somebody was capable of beating him

Look guys I dont care either way I will leave it up to you thats why I put it up for a Vote instead of being a tyrant about it...
but as Crhis said we have been here before ... I pulled my Barb of my own free will one time and everybody else convinced me to put him back on....
I just find it frustrating that People are crying about it now

Quote (Swiss_Army @ Tue, Sep 29 2009, 11:32am)

Well I only said yes because of my previous scenario which is pretty much void. And it's not like every single person on the ladder will be using two chars, not everyone is that freakin' rich



Change my vote to No for rule 3

Quote (Krom III @ Tue, Sep 29 2009, 12:34pm)

What is this sling spot?

lol...how about NO TWO CHARACTERS OCCUPYING NEIGHBORING RANK? Since you CANNOT skip and CAN only duel one by one in top 5. ex: having ranks 3 and 4 looking for rank 2 victory.

Stop making this difficult for us man.

Quote (SirSteve1 @ Fri, Sep 25 2009, 11:19am)