Quote (Temptress @ Jan 6 2010 08:29pm)
i feel it is like this. you may not be a good poker player (may not be the case) and you send a "poker shark" in to play for you without telling the other person about the "poker shark". this is how it looks. tell me how that is right and gm. know that if i am wrong, i am big enough to admit it. are you? i posted you in my profile for the reason i just stated, nothing more, nothing less. that is why provided a link.
here's a comment i had for what you said in one of the threads, but the thread was locked. read it and understand.
Quote (Temptress @ Jan 6 2010 06:52pm)
but not with the person he played. he was under the impression it was with the one he agreed to play, not anyone else.
you just don't understand....
in an All in its very common for a med to play the game for one of the parties, as it requires no strategy, and is essentially the same as flipping a coin. you are dealt one hand. the better hand wins. game over. what is so wrong about the MEDIATOR playing the game? if anything, makes decisions faster, as the person in control of the forum gold can pipe it off asap.
i understand you looking at this from a trading perspective, but its totally different from the poker perspective.