I was thinking, do people trilane mid? if not, then why? think of it, you put 2 carries top/bot for solo, mid you put a lane controller+2 gankers.


you got 2 carries soloing, enemy mid owned, and a 2 gankers wich are ready and fast comnig top/bot with runes to gank for carries kills ;O

what you think?

Ok
Let's say enemies run 2-1-2 then
Your solo carries don't get any farm cause they get owned 1n2, while their carry(ies) freefarm on sidelane
They just put someone mid with escape skill and only leech xp, NP
Your gankers in mid lane are too low leveled to gank proper due to trilane
-> you get owned hard

doh you dont do that when the build dont suit.. -.-

mid lane is too short/open and way too easy for a solo to survive against a trilane for it to be a good idea

and it will ruin the other lanes

100 gold and you'd be unkillable mid
maybe no farm, but you'd win side lanes unless your teammates had serious downs or if the lane composition was trash (2 shitty heroes vs solo valk or something)

This post was edited by dude150 on Jan 28 2011 07:24am

lets say dw/dev mid,

tri lane woudl stop hsi farm and make him rly useless..

and top/bot lanes have no stuns/slow,

solo valk/solo fa top bot.

would be damn great.

This post was edited by Anton on Jan 28 2011 08:10am

hmm maybe ill try this for shits sounds fun.

have you ever played a game where neither of the lanes had a stun/slow and sucked so much ass anyway that they couldn't stop a freaking valk/fa from farm when they're 2vs1?
and devo/dw isn't that great late so why waste 3 people on them? :/

This post was edited by pawa on Jan 28 2011 08:20am