27 + 216 = 125?

bro business math confuse me

This post was edited by dude150 on Jun 5 2011 07:48pm

unless 19 and female and went back a year and they are sexy as fuck

le fu

sin(arctanx/5)
A. x over x+5
B. x over square root x^2 + 25
C. 5 over square root x^2 + 25
D. square root 25-x^2
E. None

how 2 do

like arctan = square root 2 over 2
.......... idk

anyone wanna stomp?

post pics please to make this thread less gay

By computerized searching, greatly accelerated by aid of modular arithmetic, this conjecture has been verified for all values of all six variables up to 1000.[2] So in any counterexample, at least one of the variables must be greater than 1000.
A variation of the conjecture where x, y, z (instead of A, B, C) must have a common prime factor is not true. See, for example 274 + 1623 = 97.
Beal's conjecture is a generalization of Fermat's last theorem, which corresponds to the case x = y = z. If ax + bx = cx with , then either the bases are coprime or share a common factor. If they share a common factor, it can be divided out of each to yield an equation with smaller, coprime bases.
The conjecture is not valid over the larger domain of Gaussian integers. After a prize of $50 was offered for a counterexample, Fred W. Helenius provided (−2 + i)3 + (−2 − i)3 = (1 + i)4.[3


ctrl c ctrl v

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beals_conjecture

i did not read what i pasted in here i just know how to google things.
I would read if this had an impact on me but as is it does not and what i have copied here could be completely wrong

This post was edited by wesley123 on Jun 5 2011 07:51pm

yes well it probably is impossible to determine for the time being


lol

go fap

http://forums.d2jsp.org/img.php?i=679729

also fags, creepers and old men own cameras.

jersey shore imo

shes gonna die from skin cancer

This post was edited by iffy1 on Jun 5 2011 07:52pm

Because you just took it off wiki or some other site lol