Quote (DiS505 @ Feb 2 2014 10:11pm)
Please tell me you're not so ignorant to believe that the King James Version is the only legitimate Bible

What you're saying is not Biblical, and it's wrong. You can definitely study the Bible when you aren't saved, you don't have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, but God can still use the Spirit to convict you to the point of salvation.
I think where you're getting confused is that you think that merely having an intellectual belief in Jesus is enough to save you, which isn't the case.
The scripture you shared yourself in Acts 17:1-4 proves my point, Paul used Scripture to reason with the Jews in the synagogue, if those who aren't saved weren't able to comprehend the Scriptures why would that have had any effect on them? It's completely illogical.
Your attitude toward the lost, calling them "conceited and foolish unbelievers" is not the heart that Jesus, nor any of the disciples in the Bible had toward them. I think you need to reevaluate your heart, and the Bible.
We are called to love the lost.
I thought there was One God, thus only one word of God- & not 300.
You are wrong for not believing that one Bible. If we didnt have it, we couldnt be saved from our sins. You CANT study the Bible without having first believed on Christ as Savior. The Holy Spirit will NOT use the NIV, it is NOT the word of God- the very fact the NIV calls Christ or the morning star "Lucifer" proves it preaches another Jesus.
^^The highest point you can get is conviction from hearing or reading the King James- however, study is only possible once the sinner believes on Jesus as testified of the scripture from the doctrine of Christ- once settled with the faith, knowledge from scripture study with the Holy Ghost increases.
The confusion is not caused by the King James, but by the NIV's text. Theres no such thing as "intellectual belief"- that is philosophy. The doctrine you get from the NIV and the other hell hole perversions is the scholar's own opinion or heresy- it disagrees with the reading of the Textus Receptus & the KJB, thus its not the word of God.
"And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews." - Acts 17:10
^^The jews of acts 17:11 are NOT of the same synagogue as those of Acts 17:1-4. The point is that both received Christ from Paul' preaching and reasoning from the scripture.
"Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand" - 1st Corinthians 15 verse 1.
^^ The very same sequence the scripture shows in both cases is Paul preaching the gospel & them believing or receiving it.
THEREAFTER they studied the word of God to see if
"those things [Paul preached]
were so".. Theres no logic, its all of the scripture with faith in Christ.
"But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?"- Luke 12:20
^^Jesus Christ is Almighty God (see John 8:24), so its no difference to Him. Someone who refuses to believe after having heard the gospel clearly preached is a fool who's headed for hell without remedy.
"For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost." [U]- Matthew 18:11
^^Evidently
the NIV DOESNT CARE ABOUT THE LOST SINCE IT DELETED THAT VERSE. Its a worthless piece of paper that calls Jesus a sinner. Youll have to do better than call God a liar if souls are ever to be reached.
Our attitudes or feelings dont matter at all- the only thing that counts' what the scripture says. The book of Romans tells us how to get saved- you seen those Roman's road verses all over. The NIV aint gonna save anybody - so are you gonna read & believe God's word- the King James, or will you stay "wise in your own conceit"?