Quote (Poonisher @ Feb 5 2011 02:00am)
i'd be careful man, there is a tactful way of stating your opinion and being a douche isn't one of them especially around here. Unlike you i am genuinely interested in hearing the opinions of people with a faith more fierce than any facts you or i could whip out..
Being an intellect you need to leave open room for the possibilities of anyone being right, and nobody being right.
In my existential quest to figure out the origin of man i cannot seem to get past the question.
Do you trust more someone who never changed their story or rarely does.
Or someone who ever so often contradicts itself to advance.
is there a difference between acting like a douche and calling someone by that same name?
apparently during your search for the answer to everything you haven't stumbled much upon biology/chemistry/physics. if you had then you'd know that only through disorder and subjection to specific stimuli can an organism grow.
if his faith is strong as you claim it to be than words on an internet forum will not sway him. if it is not than perhaps he will adapt and grow stronger in his faith thanks to my opinions.
we are all entitled to an opinion would you not agree? do you think that this is the first time that he has heard my particular opinion? and will it be the last?
how will he be prepared for future encounters if no one presented the other side of the argument? i guess he could do like many others do and put their fingers in their ears like an adolescent while subsequently yelling "na nanana na i can't hear you nanana"
/e furthermore he asked a question. i proceeded to answer it. you on the other hand commented on my post then proceeded to post how you admired his faith (an obvious continuation of the previous post). never addressing his question directly. spam?
This post was edited by zeratul87 on Feb 5 2011 07:15pm