Quote (Kamahl16 @ 30 Dec 2009 16:01)
The "He" in question could be replaced with any other individual and/or deity and the statement would hold equal weight, thus it is rhetorical garbage.
Well, it'd be a pretty obvious lie if it was applied to a dude, since dudes neither have understanding beyond [an implied human] comprehension, nor power that is absolute.
It could apply to other gods, depending on definition, but it's sort of defining an omnipotent and omniscient being, so how's that surprising?