d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Computers & IT > Programming & Development > * Bitcoin Discussion * > Your Thoughts?
1237Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 23,023
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 269.00
Mar 7 2014 11:33am
If this must be moved, move it, but please don't close it! I did briefly look for an economics or finance section!

A 3 year old bitcoin marketing/informational video on youtube, thought I would share my exchange with an ASIC consp theorist, keep in mind ASIC chips were not around up until recently, and there is much room for improvement! Please let me know who you side with, if any at all!


Video Link: http://youtu.be/Um63OQz3bjo
About OP: http://www.weusecoins.com/en/about

Quote (shadyparadox)
The comments section is so full of facepalm. People keep calling artificial numbers that were farted out of a banker's ass "real money".

If you don't know how the fiat monetary system works, then you certainly have no hope understanding how Bitcoin works, and you shouldn't be commenting.

Quote (RonPaul4EverAndEver)
If you don't really know how the fiat monetary system works and have no understanding of ponzi schemes then you have no hope of understanding Bitcoin is a scam and you shouldn't be investing or commenting. Good luck. ;)

Quote (shadyparadox)
Gee whiz, I had never heard that one before, thanks for your brilliant insight. I'll just throw out everything I thought I knew about computer science, cryptography, and economics, and replace it all with an FUD buzzword. That really cleared things up.

Let's be real. A Ponzi scheme is a zero-sum centralized con game in which suckers hand their investments directly to the con man, and there is no transparency about where the money goes. In fact, the con man doesn't invest the money at all, he just keeps it all for himself and disappears.

The fiat monetary system is a centralized con game in which the central banks do not just print as much currency as they want, they actually loan it into existence and expect it to be paid back over time with interest. This debt-based monetary system therefore always has more debt in existence than currency, and can only be sustained as long as people take out enough new loans to replace the old ones.

Bitcoin is a solution to the Byzantine Generals problem, a puzzle that had stumped computer scientists for 35 years. The proof-of-work algorithm solves the double-spending issue while maintaining decentralization, thereby creating scarcity in the otherwise non-scarce digital world for the first time. Obviously this can't be a Ponzi scheme because, well, it's decentralized and the transaction ledger is public.

Lastly, people like you are the ones who know nothing, do no research whatsoever, and yet feel qualified to condescend toward those who have. You think people that are involved only see it as a means to get rich quick thanks to the skyrocketing price, when in fact you are the one blinded by the price because you fail to see any other aspects of the protocol.

Quote (RonPaul4EverAndEver)
Gee, no? Well that would explain a lot. Throwing out a few buzzwords is ironically the same as what you are accusing me of, I sincerely doubt you hold any form of qualification in computer science, cryptography nor economics. So let's not play the penis comparing game.

Well you know the basics of ponzi schemes but have not taken into consideration their evolution and development, how scammers have become more intelligent and insidious- for instance why would you need to "directly" give your money to them? Surely indirectly would work just as well. And who are you handing your money too? The ASIC manufacturers! Where's the transparency there? Where is that money going?

Yes, yes, the Bitcoin structure is glazed over with complex mathematical and computing jargon, making it too complex for the average investor to fully grasp (a dream for ponzi con men) I don't see how this legitimizes anything, argument by complexity lol.

The coins are a red-herring, you see your exponentially complex Byzantine Generals ASIC hardware doesn't have much use to it other than mining no? Will it not be outdated and worthless in no time? Will the manufacturers be laughing to the bank? You see this is the "product" creating fiat, the value is based on these increasingly worthless chips, unlike say gold. So mining becomes less and less profitable, less and less used, and it hits a complexity that can't be cracked, ta da we have your zero-sum and stagnation. The ups and downs of their monopoly money is just yet another indicator that something isn't right, speaking of centralized- who are the people making billions? Oh yeah that's right- the money laundering, drug dealing mafia.

Wow, you know so much, please take all my money. Heh, but seriously now, it's really gonna hurt people with such a high view of themselves when they realize they've been duped like the biggest idiots out there.


This post was edited by LulzSec on Mar 7 2014 11:39am
Member
Posts: 11,637
Joined: Feb 2 2004
Gold: 434.84
Mar 7 2014 12:52pm
I'll help you out a bit:

The RonPaul4EverAndEver guy is right and the shadyparadox guy is an idiot. Hope this helps.
Member
Posts: 23,023
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 269.00
Mar 7 2014 01:14pm
Quote (rockonkenshin @ Mar 7 2014 10:52am)
I'll help you out a bit:

The RonPaul4EverAndEver guy is right and the shadyparadox guy is an idiot. Hope this helps.


+1 for RonPaul
Member
Posts: 1,995
Joined: Jun 28 2006
Gold: 7.41
Mar 7 2014 01:36pm
Shadyparadox has my vote.

Ronpaul dude doesn't understand the full protocol. His understanding of bit coin mining becoming stagnant and dying off leading too a zero-sum is factored into the protocol. You can't mine forever. There is a finite amount of coins. And value does not become stagnant. Because the currency is maintained digitally events such as hard drive crashes will wipe portions of the currency off the table. Bitcoins, over time, will become more valuable as the total number in existance diminishes. Until it is completely wiped out, giving a lead in for a new currency to take it's place. It's like this by design to prevent hyperinflation and corruption.
Member
Posts: 23,023
Joined: Jul 6 2012
Gold: 269.00
Mar 7 2014 01:55pm
Quote (Minkomonster @ Mar 7 2014 11:36am)
Shadyparadox has my vote.

Ronpaul dude doesn't understand the full protocol. His understanding of bit coin mining becoming stagnant and dying off leading too a zero-sum is factored into the protocol. You can't mine forever. There is a finite amount of coins. And value does not become stagnant. Because the currency is maintained digitally events such as hard drive crashes will wipe portions of the currency off the table. Bitcoins, over time, will become more valuable as the total number in existance diminishes. Until it is completely wiped out, giving a lead in for a new currency to take it's place. It's like this by design to prevent hyperinflation and corruption.


Which could be litecoin or any non fiat-monetary.
Member
Posts: 11,637
Joined: Feb 2 2004
Gold: 434.84
Mar 7 2014 02:14pm
Quote (Minkomonster @ Mar 7 2014 02:36pm)
Shadyparadox has my vote.

Ronpaul dude doesn't understand the full protocol. His understanding of bit coin mining becoming stagnant and dying off leading too a zero-sum is factored into the protocol. You can't mine forever. There is a finite amount of coins. And value does not become stagnant. Because the currency is maintained digitally events such as hard drive crashes will wipe portions of the currency off the table. Bitcoins, over time, will become more valuable as the total number in existance diminishes. Until it is completely wiped out, giving a lead in for a new currency to take it's place. It's like this by design to prevent hyperinflation and corruption.


Except that since the currency is finite you will eventually get to the point where there are small numbers of users who own large amounts of BTC causing massive deflation which only benefits those at the very top of the chain. Banking on people losing their currency is a silly way to regulate a currency.

Can you expand on how a completely unregulated currency with huge holes in it's protocol counteracts corruption given that there are already two large bitcoin exchanges currently being investigated for criminal liability in both Canada and the US?
Member
Posts: 1,995
Joined: Jun 28 2006
Gold: 7.41
Mar 7 2014 02:49pm
Quote (rockonkenshin @ Mar 7 2014 03:14pm)
Except that since the currency is finite you will eventually get to the point where there are small numbers of users who own large amounts of BTC causing massive deflation which only benefits those at the very top of the chain. Banking on people losing their currency is a silly way to regulate a currency.

Can you expand on how a completely unregulated currency with huge holes in it's protocol counteracts corruption given that there are already two large bitcoin exchanges currently being investigated for criminal liability in both Canada and the US?


What you are describing is a deflationary spiral due to hoarding. This applies to currencies backed by a commodity. If you consider btc a commodity then yes, hoarding cab occur. But that is not what it is intended to be used as. That is not the point of the protocol.

Crime is crime. People lie cheat and steal. That is going to exist regardless. The protocol was never intended to be utizlized with an exchange. Anything other than a bit coin wallet is an unintended use. You can't blame the protocol for people who blatantly disregard the security built into it.

I am not advocating the usage of btc. I am merely commenting on the specs of the protocol that are being glossed over.
Member
Posts: 11,637
Joined: Feb 2 2004
Gold: 434.84
Mar 7 2014 02:58pm
Quote (Minkomonster @ Mar 7 2014 03:49pm)
What you are describing is a deflationary spiral due to hoarding. This applies to currencies backed by a commodity. If you consider btc a commodity then yes, hoarding cab occur. But that is not what it is intended to be used as. That is not the point of the protocol.

Crime is crime. People lie cheat and steal. That is going to exist regardless. The protocol was never intended to be utizlized with an exchange. Anything other than a bit coin wallet is an unintended use. You can't blame the protocol for people who blatantly disregard the security built into it.

I am not advocating the usage of btc. I am merely commenting on the specs of the protocol that are being glossed over.


How does it not apply to bitcoin? A finite supply encourages people to hold on to BTC and not spend it. I don't see anything about bitcoin in general that would incentivize those who hold large amounts of btc to return that to the rest of the economy proper when they really have nothing to lose by hoarding. How does not being backed by a commodity change that? I'm not an economist, just a computer science nerd with some interest in the subject and I like hearing both sides of things like this.

Of course crime will always exist. Regulations and laws exist to discourage crime. Unregulated, "wild-west" currencies currently promote crime by nature of the currency being untraceable and un-retrievable. You can of course throw down a caveat emptor argument with regards to this but if cryptocurrency ever wants to be mainstream they are going to have to address it because the average person shouldn't have to be an economist just to be able to use a currency and not get ripped off. Even if bitcoin is being misused and is outside of it's intended purpose I would argue that it is woefully naive to think that it wouldn't absolutely be used in this way.
Member
Posts: 1,995
Joined: Jun 28 2006
Gold: 7.41
Mar 7 2014 03:08pm
Quote (rockonkenshin @ Mar 7 2014 03:58pm)
How does it not apply to bitcoin? A finite supply encourages people to hold on to BTC and not spend it. I don't see anything about bitcoin in general that would incentivize those who hold large amounts of btc to return that to the rest of the economy proper when they really have nothing to lose by hoarding. How does not being backed by a commodity change that? I'm not an economist, just a computer science nerd with some interest in the subject and I like hearing both sides of things like this.

Of course crime will always exist. Regulations and laws exist to discourage crime. Unregulated, "wild-west" currencies currently promote crime by nature of the currency being untraceable and un-retrievable. You can of course throw down a caveat emptor argument with regards to this but if cryptocurrency ever wants to be mainstream they are going to have to address it because the average person shouldn't have to be an economist just to be able to use a currency and not get ripped off. Even if bitcoin is being misused and is outside of it's intended purpose I would argue that it is woefully naive to think that it wouldn't absolutely be used in this way.


Valid concerns. And I will admit, I am in the same boat as you. I am an avid computer scientist with an interest in this cool nerdy thing. I have no advanced degree in economics though, and my attempts to refute your points would be naive at best and heavily flawed. I am merely relaying the extent of what I have read into these issues.From what I have read eeconomists seem to draw a distinction between commodity backed currencies and btc. I do notffully understand the logistics behind it, just that it is more or less accepted that the protocol handles these concerns and to treat btc the same as a normal currency is not right.

I apologize if I came off in my statements as someone with advanced economic knowledge. I was merely trying to spawn discussion in an effort to increase my knowledge on the subject. I cannot adequately debate the topic with you though.
Member
Posts: 11,637
Joined: Feb 2 2004
Gold: 434.84
Mar 7 2014 03:42pm
Quote (Minkomonster @ Mar 7 2014 04:08pm)
Valid concerns. And I will admit, I am in the same boat as you. I am an avid computer scientist with an interest in this cool nerdy thing. I have no advanced degree in economics though, and my attempts to refute your points would be naive at best and heavily flawed. I am merely relaying the extent of what I have read into these issues.From what I have read eeconomists seem to draw a distinction between commodity backed currencies and btc. I do notffully understand the logistics behind it, just that it is more or less accepted that the protocol handles these concerns and to treat btc the same as a normal currency is not right.

I apologize if I came off in my statements as someone with advanced economic knowledge. I was merely trying to spawn discussion in an effort to increase my knowledge on the subject. I cannot adequately debate the topic with you though.


Same here. It's fun talking about this to someone who is also an uninvested third party to it. The true believers are insufferable.
Go Back To Programming & Development Topic List
1237Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll