He is not arguing against the efficiency of Google, but until your hand was held and you were told exactly what to search you didn't yield anything fruitful. Only to further his point Google isn't the catch all answer.



Again I don't think that was his point either. He is not trying to say knowledge of this obscure SQL injection method makes you a good software engineer but that not everything is a Google search away.

This post was edited by ROM on May 18 2017 05:26am

You only assume this, while I knew the attack before. This really isn't anything special or hard, but it took me 3 posts to realise he's having a hard-on for mid-school level math and was confused why is it so important to calculate it (again, with the exact formula available right away).

Sure, the attack is interesting and may be useful but has nothing to do with being well educated. It was, in fact, google search away.

This post was edited by nuvo on May 18 2017 05:28am

Sure? You knew what he was talking about but given the opportunity you made it look like you didn't.

/edit

Plot twist. Now that the answer was given I knew all along too.

This post was edited by ROM on May 18 2017 05:35am

If you asked me how to add 2 and 2 I would also look confused.

In my very first post I wrote exact thing to stop him, no matter how much theory he swallowed.

And I can be a millionaire but I just don't want to be.

Full disclousure, I wrote that article. And the software that applies it. Notice the examples and math is in Ruby

That is why the article was "a google search away". Because I released it. If I would of asked the same question 1 year ago you wouldn't be able to find anything. Nor calculate it apparently because `mid-level' math seems to be hard.

Here's the poc video: https://asciinema.org/a/49369 You can find the logs located at around 3:19 under "partial blind attack"

And that article was ripped from the website I wrote it on.

Inb4 "you didn't write that software" and I'll have to VPN into the network to screenshot the git repo.

Now what's your excuse?



That wasn't the point. I'm saddened you missed it. The point was Google won't carry you through everything and when it doesn't you will fall flat on your face as documented above.

ROM is the only one here who gets it.

Edit:: full disclosure I never went to school.

This post was edited by AbDuCt on May 18 2017 08:00am

This much is true you are right.

Some of us are leagues apart. Some designs and innovates new ideas and techniques, the others simply spews code off Google.

This post was edited by AbDuCt on May 18 2017 08:36am

If you are the one who wrote it, great (and I don't need proofs lol). It is an interesting concept that needed to be developed, you got me there. My point still stands: it's a poor example for advanced math and engineering, and the way you deal with sqli is not calculating maximum throughput for sniffing data, but stop it completely.

And I really don't want to go into dick measuring contest lol, but you're not the only one who can design "and innovate". The difference between us is that you seriously lack some humility.

My entire point was stated above. If some people can't Google a solution then they can't solve the problem.

That was it, my entire point the entire time. The rest was just an example of something that's easy to solve but harder to Google.

Nothing more nothing less.

This post was edited by AbDuCt on May 18 2017 10:00am

this is a pretty interesting concept