While we are struggling to heat our homes, we have to pay 100 million for your parade.

#AbolishMonarchyOnceAndForAll

lefties doting over old rich whytie elite

Sums up Western free speech in a nutshell, really.

This guy waits hours and hours in a crowd so he can be at the front and yell generally reasonable things at a rich pedophile worth billions. This results in viral clips and memes, absolutely nothing changes, and tomorrow King Charles and Prince Andrew will be planning their next vacation to some privately owned child-rape island in the Caribbean.

You say "King Charles gets owned," but you'll still wake up tomorrow with 0.0001% of his net worth, and so will your kids and grandkids and great grandkids. It's all theatre that self-validates the system that has produced the theatre.

This post was edited by kusotarre1 on Sep 22 2022 01:32am

LMAO
Exactly same can be said for Putin who doesn't even go in front of anyone who doesn't allow testing of their poop in private lab prior LOL
At least in UK People don't live in shacks like in Russia LOL

where in the world is free speech in a better state then? i'm genuinely curious.

i mean you're right about this not changing anything in the short term, but this guy will not "fall" out of a window tomorrow, accidentally consume polonium, or disappear to some labour camp to be re-educated. he also won't be socially isolated by his peers.

doesn't mean it's perfect. people HAVE indeed been punished for criticising the monarchy, which is unacceptable imo - but that doesn't change the fact that speech is still the freest in what we call the "western world".

Ultimately England voted for Brexit and the ensuing 10 years (minimum) of poverty it wold create. I fail to see how this is the fault of their monarchy, the people voted for it.



I think the conservatives are in power in the UK, and have been for a while now (having been elected) I dont see that protestor doting though and fail to consider him a leftie.



I missed the article's about Charles being a pedophile, or owning his very own child rape island in the caribbean. its safer to throw such accusations at Prince Andrew. This is merely a cheap shot at an old handicapped man. to your comment: I mean in a family you can have a priest and a pedo, they dont have to be the same person (yes i accept the response "but are not all priests...". so in summary there is enough ammunition against Charles without having to making up false accusations.



one mans freedom is another shackles. As I understand it there is a high degree of monitoring in england. i have english friends that left the country for this reason.

This post was edited by ferdia on Sep 22 2022 08:43am

what terrible slander, Prince Andrew was NOT a child rapist. he's a pseudoconsensual young teen sex enthusiast.

i have difficulty over the word "was" noting its past tense.

he never was a child rapist, and still isn't.

he was a teen enthusiast, and likely still is, with the aid of blue pills im sure.

As I understand it the age of consent in most US states is 16, so I will acknowledge your point (she was 17 he was 41).