An Indian MP Nupur Sharma quoted the quran and referred to the pedo-wizard muhammad as a pedophile.

muslims all over the world are up in arms about this.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/06/middleeast/india-islam-comments-gulf-mime-intl/index.html

Now, the anger stems from her belittling the pedophile for being a pedophile, not that she said anything untruthful about him.

Because the fraud moohambutt was indeed a pedophile who married a pre-teen girl named aisha when she was 6 and started raping her when she was 9.

Predictably, leftist fanfictions like BBC are furiously denouncing not just Sharma but all of Indian Hindus for "islamophobia".

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-61717423

https://www.dw.com/en/india-faces-backlash-over-bjps-islamophobic-remarks/a-62040673

Yes... It is now islamophobic to quote the quran.

This post was edited by player11167 on Jun 13 2022 12:20pm

Phobia...

Justifiable hatred =/= irrational fear.

India is in no position to speak CURRENTLY about the treatment of children let alone an event from the 600s.

That doesn't change the fact that he was a pedophile and all she did was call a spade a spade.

Did he have lots of underage wives? Or just this one....the daughter of an influential man...who records show he didn't force a sexual relationship with for YEARS....who he kept as a respected wife for the rest of his life....who he died in the arms of.

Pedophilia today is a much bigger monster than a political marriage of ages past. You are trying to equate him to the disgusting current religious pedophiles that destroy the lives of their victims while they hold a place of power which is very different than what happened to Aisha.

You want to speak for Aisha but she did plenty of speaking for herself.

And to state the obvious...her age is still debatable.

This post was edited by Subwoofer on Jun 13 2022 01:03pm

Oh yes, the beautiful love story between a confused 6 year old girl and a man in his 50's.

Did you know that the word "pedophile" doesn't mean you have to rape multiple little girls? One is enough to make you a pedophile. Like the fraud moooooohambutt.

It means you are attracted sexually to children. Children in these times meaning you haven't hit puberty. Her age which is debatable even at the lowest numbers would put her close to puberty by the time they are said to actually of been physical. Even a few years in interpretation is the difference between 10 and 13.

Trying to white knight for people 1400 years ago by using our current standards of "adult" is again...stupid. You gonna go complain about cavemen having sex with pubescent girls next?

To use such a charged term as "pedophile" in this situation is purely inflammatory.

Have you ever been outside and seen 3rd ~ 6th graders? Do they look like adults to you? Oh and btw today's kids grow up so much faster than kids in the past. Especially children in the 7th century.

Now why would a guy in his 50's with more sex slaves than he can count and like a dozen wives need to prey on a little girl? I smell pedophile.

This post was edited by player11167 on Jun 13 2022 01:32pm

He didn't. Her father was an influential figure so it was political in nature. It's stands to reason that he didn't care for the child part if he waited YEARS to get physical(which was most likely waiting for puberty).

YEARS. All 3 years. Until she was 9. That would put her at a third grade level.

A 50 year old man (supposedly holy) who waited YEARS but couldn't wait until she was old enough to look like an actual human adult, who raped a girl who was a very tiny version of today's third-grader.

Ew

This post was edited by player11167 on Jun 13 2022 01:36pm