Is an alpha male.

Holy fuck - that boss voice is dominating the court.

link? cba searching. bout to jump in the garden for the day. worm farm start to thrive.

member of active vigilante force present to stop crime against the wishes of police, claims that vigilante mob chasing him after he shot someone shouldnt have because he said he was going to turn himself into and cooperate with police.

17 year old illegally carries weapon across state lines to protect property that is covered by insurance, shoots someone, and then claims he did not want confrontation.

Irrelevant.

not logically or legally irrelevant. Kyle's intent entering the situation is directly relevant to his self defense argument, which by the way i think he'll be successful in raising.

the defense needs to separate his presence, illegally, where he was from the act itself and likely will. but its the only reason that self defense isn't an open shut case. as well as potential rulings that seek to show someone illegally carrying a firearm cannot use deadly force even in self defense, which i dont think will apply.

the juxtaposition is still humorous. Kyle was shitting his pants because he didnt think he'd be anything but a cosplayer that people would run from as he defended a gas station that wouldnt have lost a dime even if it burned to the ground. the defense is even trying to claim he only went because someone asked him, watering down his intent to be a hero.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 2 2021 11:14am

Kyle is allowed to drive 20 minutes to 'cross state lines' and protect any business he wants to - even if its because he's looking for trouble.

His initial intent to look for action isn't what he is on trial for; its whether or not he acted in self defense once he found what he was looking for - which he did.

This post was edited by LoverManGenius on Nov 2 2021 11:17am

looking for trouble and self defense aren't legally congruent.

crossing state lines as a minor with a firearm is a crime.

clearly you have opinions, that's fine, the law doesnt agree.

i personally dont think he wanted to fire his firearm that night at all, wasnt looking for trouble, just wanted to look cool. big fail. and he's on the hook for crossing state lines in any case, whether its 20 mins or 4 hours away.

The prosecutor admitted in his opening statement that the gun was purchased in Wisconsin and had never left Wisconsin.

The prosecutor (the guy trying to prove rittenhouse is guilty for all the lefty’s here) destroyed every left wing narrative you have all been repeating over and over for the past year. The worst thing he had to say about rittenhouse is that he did not stop to give medical care to the pedophile (convicted pedophile) after he shot him.

The guy who was being chased down and killed a couple people in self defense, and wounded another who came at him with a glock, didn’t stop to help tend to the wounds of one of the people chasing him down while vocally shouting their intent to cause physical harm. Not to mention during the chase somebody fired a gun in the air. Not to mention the entire incident is on video from beginning to end. This is the only real attack in rittenhouse from the opening statements made by the man trying to put him away.


This whole case is pathetic. It has been a few hours and the same case has been provided by both sides.