d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > 60 Minutes Fumbling
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Apr 11 2021 02:43pm
60 minutes one of the more respected investigative journalism platforms recently did a segment on Covid vaccine availability in Florida. The actual story was basically focusing on how the vaccine is primarily available to the wealthy but they ended up accusing DeSantis, Florida's conservative governor of pay-to-play because Publix made financial donations to his campaign and they were chosen as a Covid vaccine location. At this point, several people and organizations, including democrats within the state are basically saying the 60 minutes accusations are false. There was also some deceptive editing within the 60 minutes segment that makes it appear DeSantis appearing angry and evading the question when the full unedited version shows a very different reality. CBS is doubling down.


Quote

...

A story reported by Sharyn Alfonsi and produced by Oriana Zill de Granados suggested that Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis gave grocery chain Publix preferential treatment to distribute COVID-19 vaccines because Publix donated $100,000 to DeSantis’ reelection campaign.

If that is true — if DeSantis ran a “pay-for-play” scheme involving vaccinations for the coronavirus — that’s an explosive story. But “60 Minutes” really didn’t deliver substantial evidence that DeSantis did any such thing.

Yes, Publix donated to DeSantis’ reelection campaign. But that is neither illegal nor unusual. Big companies often donate to political campaigns of both major parties. Yet the “60 Minutes” piece used that as the main evidence for its premise that DeSantis did something shady. They really didn’t have much else on that topic. There was really no there there.

And the thing is, the part about Publix wasn’t even the main part of the story, which was really about whether the wealthy were able to cut the line to get the vaccine.

But all the attention now is about this sketchy passing reference to the Publix thing. As far as that goes, DeSantis said the reason Florida partnered with Publix was that Publix could roll out the vaccine in days, whereas other pharmacies could not move that quickly.

DeSantis has blasted “60 Minutes,” calling the claims “irresponsible.” He said, “I know corporate media thinks that they can just run over people. You ain’t running over this governor. I’m punching back and I’m going to continue to do it until these smear merchants are held accountable.”

He added, “That’s why nobody trusts corporate media. They are a disaster in what they are doing. They knew what they were doing was a lie.”

In a statement, Publix said, “The irresponsible suggestion that there was a connection between campaign contributions made to Governor DeSantis and our willingness to join other pharmacies in support of the state’s vaccine distribution efforts is absolutely false and offensive.”

Even Democrats are blasting the story.

Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Jared Moskowitz, who is a Democrat, tweeted, “I said this before and I’ll say it again. (Publix) was recommended by (Florida Division of Emergency Management) and (Florida Department of Public Health) as the other pharmacies were not ready to start. Period! Full Stop! No one from the Governor’s office suggested Publix. It’s just absolute malarkey.”

Palm Beach County Mayor Dave Kerner, another Democrat, called the “60 Minutes” piece “intentionally false.”



https://www.poynter.org/newsletters/2021/60-minutes-misses-the-mark-in-its-story-about-florida-gov-ron-desantis-and-covid-19-vaccines/
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 11 2021 03:03pm
hmmm. is there a way to verify if publix got the contract because they promised to roll out the vaccine significantly quicker than their competitors, or do we have to rely on the word of someone who has been trying to downplay the severity of an infection and florida's true case numbers for basically the duration of the pandemic? it is my understanding that publix has a massive disadvantage in terms of branch distribution, meaning local availability would be worse than that of some of its competitors.

also, just because it might not be "illegal" or "unusual" to receive large donations like that in a corrupt shithole, i'd still like some more context to narrow down if this particular one is "shady" or not: did publix make similar donations to democrats? when exactly did they donate the money? did their competitors also donate, and what amounts? has publix donated to moskowitz and kerner as well?

IF all of the above interactions happened favourably and according to desantis' descriptions, i would agree that it's a bit of a smear that he, depite his previous shady actions regarding covid, doesn't deserve - but i'd say we need a lot more transparency from his office to confirm that.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Apr 11 2021 03:12pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 11 2021 01:43pm)
60 minutes one of the more respected investigative journalism platforms recently did a segment on Covid vaccine availability in Florida. The actual story was basically focusing on how the vaccine is primarily available to the wealthy but they ended up accusing DeSantis, Florida's conservative governor of pay-to-play because Publix made financial donations to his campaign and they were chosen as a Covid vaccine location. At this point, several people and organizations, including democrats within the state are basically saying the 60 minutes accusations are false. There was also some deceptive editing within the 60 minutes segment that makes it appear DeSantis appearing angry and evading the question when the full unedited version shows a very different reality. CBS is doubling down.





https://www.poynter.org/newsletters/2021/60-minutes-misses-the-mark-in-its-story-about-florida-gov-ron-desantis-and-covid-19-vaccines/


It does seem like 60 Minutes fucked up and there should be accountability. This is why it's important to get information from multiple sources.
Member
Posts: 28,884
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Apr 11 2021 03:27pm
Quote (fender @ Apr 11 2021 05:03pm)
hmmm. is there a way to verify if publix got the contract because they promised to roll out the vaccine significantly quicker than their competitors, or do we have to rely on the word of someone who has been trying to downplay the severity of an infection and florida's true case numbers for basically the duration of the pandemic? it is my understanding that publix has a massive disadvantage in terms of branch distribution, meaning local availability would be worse than that of some of its competitors.

also, just because it might not be "illegal" or "unusual" to receive large donations like that in a corrupt shithole, i'd still like some more context to narrow down if this particular one is "shady" or not: did publix make similar donations to democrats? when exactly did they donate the money? did their competitors also donate, and what amounts? has publix donated to moskowitz and kerner as well?

IF all of the above interactions happened favourably and according to desantis' descriptions, i would agree that it's a bit of a smear that he, depite his previous shady actions regarding covid, doesn't deserve - but i'd say we need a lot more transparency from his office to confirm that.


Yes.

Quote
Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Jared Moskowitz, who is a Democrat, tweeted, “I said this before and I’ll say it again. (Publix) was recommended by (Florida Division of Emergency Management) and (Florida Department of Public Health) as the other pharmacies were not ready to start. Period! Full Stop! No one from the Governor’s office suggested Publix. It’s just absolute malarkey.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 11 2021 03:30pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ 11 Apr 2021 23:27)
Yes.


...

Quote (fender @ 11 Apr 2021 23:03)
hmmm. is there a way to verify if publix got the contract because they promised to roll out the vaccine significantly quicker than their competitors, or do we have to rely on the word of someone who has been trying to downplay the severity of an infection and florida's true case numbers for basically the duration of the pandemic? it is my understanding that publix has a massive disadvantage in terms of branch distribution, meaning local availability would be worse than that of some of its competitors.

also, just because it might not be "illegal" or "unusual" to receive large donations like that in a corrupt shithole, i'd still like some more context to narrow down if this particular one is "shady" or not: did publix make similar donations to democrats? when exactly did they donate the money? did their competitors also donate, and what amounts? has publix donated to moskowitz and kerner as well?

IF all of the above interactions happened favourably and according to desantis' descriptions, i would agree that it's a bit of a smear that he, depite his previous shady actions regarding covid, doesn't deserve - but i'd say we need a lot more transparency from his office to confirm that.


if not, i'm inclined to believe it's true. any further information concerning the rest of my questions?
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Apr 11 2021 04:25pm
Quote (thundercock @ 11 Apr 2021 17:12)
It does seem like 60 Minutes fucked up and there should be accountability. This is why it's important to get information from multiple sources.

there won’t be. media gets special privileges when it comes to tort, libel, and slander all in the name of the first amendment (which is not absolute for common citizens like me and you, as per biden (D))
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Apr 11 2021 05:24pm
He deserved it.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Apr 11 2021 06:49pm
Can't Con the Ron
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Add Reply New Topic New Poll