d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Open Season On The 2nd Amendment
12312Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Feb 15 2021 06:21pm
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/02/14/statement-by-the-president-three-years-after-the-parkland-shooting/

Quote
This Administration will not wait for the next mass shooting to heed that call. We will take action to end our epidemic of gun violence and make our schools and communities safer. Today, I am calling on Congress to enact commonsense gun law reforms, including requiring background checks on all gun sales, banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and eliminating immunity for gun manufacturers who knowingly put weapons of war on our streets. We owe it to all those we’ve lost and to all those left behind to grieve to make a change. The time to act is now.


Congress already has a nasty bill in the works, HR127:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/127

The bill makes no bones about how far the radical left is willing to go to take away our rights:

Quote
SEC. 2. LICENSING OF FIREARM AND AMMUNITION POSSESSION; REGISTRATION OF FIREARMS.

(a) Firearm Licensing And Registration System.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“§ 932. Licensing of firearm and ammunition possession; registration of firearms


...as if our license wasn't the 2A. They also want every firearm registered, because you can't have confiscation without first achieving registration.

Quote
DATABASE.—

“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall establish and maintain a database of all firearms registered pursuant to this subsection.

“(B) ACCESS.—The Attorney General shall make the contents of the database accessible to all members of the public, all Federal, State, and local law enforcement authorities, all branches of the United States Armed Forces, and all State and local governments, as defined by the Bureau.


Here, they want the entire database accessible by the general public. Because no bad actors would ever use such a database for a shopping list on where to find the guns they want.

Quote
DENIAL OF LICENSE.—

“(A) REQUIRED.—The Attorney General shall deny such a license to an individual if—

“(i) the individual is prohibited by Federal law from possessing a firearm; or

“(ii) the individual has been hospitalized—

“(I) with a mental illness, disturbance, or diagnosis (including depression, homicidal ideation, suicidal ideation, attempted suicide, or addiction to a controlled substance (within the meaning of the Controlled Substances Act) or alcohol), or a brain disease (including dementia or Alzheimer’s); or

“(II) on account of conduct that endangers self or others.


...here they plan to keep people from seeking mental health care for fear of losing their weapons, and open up people's rights to censure by specious claims of "danger to self or others."

But wait, there's more!

Quote
“(cc) A person who possesses a firearm or to whom a license is issued under section 932(c)(1) shall have in effect an insurance policy issued under section 932(d).”


Now you'd have to pay for the exercising of your rights.

There's so much more in this bill to unpack, like the fact that they want to enable a flurry of specious lawsuits against manufacturers so that they can bankrupt the industry.

Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary. ~ Karl Marx
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Feb 15 2021 06:36pm
Blatantly unconstitutional and immoral. Anyone who votes for this should be immediately removed from office.
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 15 2021 06:36pm
So much unity and healing!
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 15 2021 06:40pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 16 Feb 2021 01:36)
So much unity and healing!


very true. a majority of americans support stricter gun laws and opposes school shootings.
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 15 2021 06:41pm
Quote (fender @ 16 Feb 2021 01:40)
very true. a majority of americans support stricter gun laws and opposes school shootings.


A majority opposes school shootings? Damn, modern society has really become pussified.




Seriously: it takes a lot more than tenuous majorities in polls to limit a constitutionally protected right. Also, the devil is obviously in the details. Stuff like bans on AR-15s might be popular, but I wouldnt be so sure when it comes to, e.g., the proposed register for all firearms.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 15 2021 06:44pm
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Feb 15 2021 06:43pm
Quote (fender @ Feb 15 2021 06:40pm)
very true. a majority of americans support stricter gun laws and opposes school shootings.


The Constitution does not care what a majority supports.

No one supports school shootings.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 15 2021 06:47pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 16 Feb 2021 01:41)
A majority opposes school shootings? Damn, modern society has really become pussified.


indeed. i'd say every dead american can't become an imperialist drone, but those damn liberals indoctrinated the west with their silly 'we care about kids even after their birth' doctrine... what can you do.
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 15 2021 06:48pm
On a more analytical note: this is not a good faith bill designed to attract bipartisan support - it's a laundry list of liberal poison pills regarding 2nd amendment rights, designed to serve as a cudgel against a (supposedly) weakened GOP and a (probably genuinely?!) weakened NRA.

Imho, this bill is not supposed to pass Congress, it's supposed to make Republicans look bad.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Feb 15 2021 06:51pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 15 2021 06:49pm
Quote (Santara @ 16 Feb 2021 01:43)
The Constitution does not care what a majority supports.

No one supports school shootings.


the constitution, in particular the 2nd amendment, has better interpretations than the NRA / gun nut one. also, my argument was a reply to a "unity" comment, not a constitutional one.
Member
Posts: 54,177
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Feb 15 2021 06:51pm
Quote (fender @ 16 Feb 2021 01:49)
the constitution, in particular the 2nd amendment, has better interpretations than the NRA / gun nut one. also, my argument was a reply to a "unity" comment, not a constitutional one.


What you call "gun nut interpretation of the constitution" has largely been affirmed by the Supreme Court in DC v. Heller:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
12312Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll