raw #s dont matter as much as %
johnson had a disasterous impeachment process (72.8% voted for impeachment in the house he escaped conviction in the senate by one vote)
Quote
Three days after Covode introduced this resolution, the House voted 126 to 47 to impeach the President, the first such action against a sitting President. Johnson’s Senate trial consumed two months, and he eventually avoided removal from office by one vote.
the numbers you compare are virtually along party lines - 5 (R)s in Clinton’s highest tally case to vote against impeachment. We will likely see the same tally here
also ‘obstruction of congress’ isn’t a real thing - Turley the non-Trump supporter testified as such: that based on the (D)s arguments presented in the impeachment inquiry, every President in US history obstructed Congress. Asking the judiciary to do its constitutionally mandated role isn’t an obstruction of congress, but we are in an era where half the legislature thinks it has more more power than both other branches and the upper chamber of the legislature combined
‘Abuse of power’ is a vague accusation masking the central issue of “we don’t like his foreign policy” and a far, far cry from the “quid pro quo” and “bribery” arguments they tried and then focus group tested (which failed)
e: it should be stated both clinton and trump’s impeachment processes are 100% politically driven by the opposition party, and have little to do with actual misconduct
This post was edited by excellence on Dec 17 2019 07:57pm