d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Keir Starmer "leader" Of England
1235Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,229
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Feb 5 2026 06:06am
This is another of my fire and forget predictions -

The TLDR here is that I predict Keir Stamer will be ousted as leader of england within the next 12 months.

Long Version ~ On 4 July 2024, Labour won a landslide, taking 411 of 650 seats and a 174‑seat majority. The Conservatives were reduced to 121 seats, effectively wiped out. Labour could do whatever it wanted. Or could it? The party’s leader was Keir Starmer. He became leader after Jeremy Corbyn failed to withstand a concerted campaign by party insiders opposed to his views on Israel. Once in power, and weeks after calling Corbyn his "friend" Starmer denied any friendship with Corbyn. He has no allies, only interests. Corbyn’s name was useful when it helped, disposable when it didn’t — transactional, not loyal. Starmer’s transactional worldview extends to his career. A human rights barrister turned Director of Public Prosecutions, he enforced the state’s power. Loyalty is optional, principle negotiable, morality expendable. Under Starmer, the UK conducted military surveillance over Gaza (providing intel to Israel to better bomb Gaza) and maintained arms exports while hypocritically calling for a ceasefire.

Since 1995 Israel repeatedly claimed that Iran was weeks from a nuclear weapon, yet Iran complied with the 2015 JCPOA deal until the U.S. broke it in 2018. The UK made token efforts to preserve the deal but backed U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities in 2025, framing it as a “grave threat” despite Iran posing no imminent danger. Basically Starmer ignores agreements and international law when its not convenient. Starmer’s approach mirrors his treatment of people: transactional and expedient. He abandons commitments and international law when convenient. Later, when the U.S. attacked Venezuela on dubious claims, Starmer again deferred to Washington rather than condemning the operation. It has now emerged that Starmer knew Peter Mandelson had continued ties to Jeffrey Epstein when he appointed him as the UK’s ambassador to the United States — and pressed ahead anyway. If leading a government is like an exam, Starmer has failed so spectacularly that his removal now seems inevitable, whether from this issue or the next (and there are several, not including Brexit blowbacks) that exposes his transactional, no‑morality worldview. I only hope the wind that blew him to our doorsteps blows again in order to remove him from the top job and UK politics altogether.

But Ferdia you cannot predict these things! ->> https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=96366683&f=119

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 5 2026 06:09am
Member
Posts: 45,717
Joined: Aug 25 2008
Gold: 40,130.00
Feb 5 2026 01:08pm
This is another of my fire and forget predictions -

The TLDR here is that I predict Keir Stamer will be ousted as leader of england within the next 12 months.

Long Version ~ On 4 July 2024, Labour won a landslide, taking 411 of 650 seats and a 174‑seat majority. The Conservatives were reduced to 121 seats, effectively wiped out. Labour could do whatever it wanted. Or could it? The party’s leader was Keir Starmer. He became leader after Jeremy Corbyn failed to withstand a concerted campaign by party insiders opposed to his views on Israel. Once in power, and weeks after calling Corbyn his "friend" Starmer denied any friendship with Corbyn. He has no allies, only interests. Corbyn’s name was useful when it helped, disposable when it didn’t — transactional, not loyal. Starmer’s transactional worldview extends to his career. A human rights barrister turned Director of Public Prosecutions, he enforced the state’s power. Loyalty is optional, principle negotiable, morality expendable. Under Starmer, the UK conducted military surveillance over Gaza (providing intel to Israel to better bomb Gaza) and maintained arms exports while hypocritically calling for a ceasefire.

Since 1995 Israel repeatedly claimed that Iran was weeks from a nuclear weapon, yet Iran complied with the 2015 JCPOA deal until the U.S. broke it in 2018. The UK made token efforts to preserve the deal but backed U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities in 2025, framing it as a “grave threat” despite Iran posing no imminent danger. Basically Starmer ignores agreements and international law when its not convenient. Starmer’s approach mirrors his treatment of people: transactional and expedient. He abandons commitments and international law when convenient. Later, when the U.S. attacked Venezuela on dubious claims, Starmer again deferred to Washington rather than condemning the operation. It has now emerged that Starmer knew Peter Mandelson had continued ties to Jeffrey Epstein when he appointed him as the UK’s ambassador to the United States — and pressed ahead anyway. If leading a government is like an exam, Starmer has failed so spectacularly that his removal now seems inevitable, whether from this issue or the next (and there are several, not including Brexit blowbacks) that exposes his transactional, no‑morality worldview. I only hope the wind that blew him to our doorsteps blows again in order to remove him from the top job and UK politics altogether.

But Ferdia you cannot predict these things! ->> https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=96366683&f=119


I am pretty sure the 6 million have been repeated multiple times since the mid 1800s...and Wah la... after WW2 it is the same number. :lol:

“Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”

- Joseph Goebbels
Member
Posts: 92,890
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Feb 5 2026 01:10pm
They will step down willingly and give the spot to a true Brit, which is of course a gay trans dwarf non binary judeo islamic refugee freedom fighter.
Member
Posts: 56,229
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Feb 5 2026 01:50pm
They will step down willingly and give the spot to a true Brit, which is of course a gay trans dwarf non binary judeo islamic refugee freedom fighter.


The is no credible alternative to Keir Starmer, which is why he SHOULD be safe in the short term. He is surrounded by incompetence. Angela Rayner is stupid, Ed Miliband is irrelevant, and the others are either not in the party or not prominent enough to be credible. His issue is every step he takes lands him in dog droppings.

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 5 2026 01:52pm
Member
Posts: 56,229
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Feb 11 2026 12:40pm
A minor update:

a. Morgan McSweeney — chief of staff to Prime Minister Keir Starmer resigned, taking responsibility for advising Starmer to appoint Mandelson as ambassador.
b. Tim Allan — Director of Communications in Downing Street also resigned shortly after McSweeney, part of the same political fallout.

Basically Starmer threw each of them under the bus, hoping their heads would satisfy Rome.

Sensing blood in the water, the health secretary Wes Streeting edged to make a move, but was promptly shut down. At the same time Labour voters seem eager to give Angela Rayner, the former Deputy Prime Minister a chance, but shes too dumb for the role and the vibe appears to be to rally around Starmer instead. Basically there is no credible alternative to Starmer so he should weather this storm - for now.

As an example of how dumb Raynor is, here is the latest headline: Brexit latest: Labour Remainer Angela Rayner slaps down calls for another Brexit referendum and says the public want us to get on with it.

The english political establishment is not ready for another Brexit referendum, so this is basically political suicide to come up with this statement at this time.

This post was edited by ferdia on Feb 11 2026 12:45pm
Member
Posts: 39,612
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Feb 20 2026 02:38am
Member
Posts: 56,229
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Feb 27 2026 01:26pm
Zack Polanski’s Green Party rocked British politics with victory in the Gorton and Denton by-election leaving Sir Keir Starmer with months to save his premiership. In a devastating blow to the Prime Minister, Labour’s vote collapsed so badly that it fell to a humiliating third place behind Nigel Farage’s Reform in the previously rock-solid Greater Manchester constituency.

same issue - no alternative to Keir Starmer, he will simply preside over the great own goal his party have ever scored.

after winning an election 400-100 they are squandering it down the toilet. the most incompetent english leader ever.
Member
Posts: 3,046
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,979.01
Feb 27 2026 05:24pm
All a successful statesman has to do at this point in our human epic is - actually prioritize the citizens of your own country. That's it. And almost every significant leader in western elite circles has a strong outgroup preference/bias.
Member
Posts: 21,955
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 331,454.58
Feb 27 2026 05:29pm
It's interesting to me that y'all are A-OK with UK having a King

but get all uppity about a republic's president.

This post was edited by Mondain on Feb 27 2026 05:29pm
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 27 2026 05:34pm
All a successful statesman has to do at this point in our human epic is - actually prioritize the citizens of your own country. That's it. And almost every significant leader in western elite circles has a strong outgroup preference/bias.


But then they wouldn't receive a big bag of shekels.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
1235Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll