d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > What Does Institutionalized Racism Look Like?
123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,680
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,886.00
Apr 29 2025 01:32am
https://alphanews.org/justice-no-longer-blind-in-hennepin-county-moriarty-orders-prosecutors-to-consider-race-in-plea-deals/

Starting today a new policy has gone into effect for prosecutors in the notorious Mary Moriarty led hennepin county courts.
It states:

>"Proposed resolutions should consider the person charged as a whole person, including their racial identity and age. While these factors should not be controlling, they should be part of the overall analysis. Racial disparities harm our community, lead to distrust, and have a negative impact on community safety. Prosecutors should be identifying and addressing racial disparities at decision points, as appropriate"

This formalizes the previously informal policy of giving suspects different treatment based on their skin color. The status quo ante was to make charging decisions different for black people and white people, asians and hispanics- but never ever admit to it. Its easy to just let go a serial offender on their 37th felony because they have the right skin color, but throw the book at a first time offender of the wrong skin color despite ample evidence exonerating them. Now that process is official policy: skin color is a determining factor in the charging process at the prosecutors office. Same prosecutors that let a convicted murderer walk with no prison time (right skin color!)
Member
Posts: 8,944
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 687.30
Apr 29 2025 01:49am
I think race should not play a role in most cases, unless it is relevant to the charges (i.e. a black man murdering a bunch of white people is more likely to be a hatecrime than if everybody had the same race).

I am a little confused by your post though. Since when are you aware and since when do you care that black people tend to get overly harsh sentences while white people, especially well connected, can e.g. rape an unconscious girl and walk free because of their otherwise bright future? You being critical of a two tiered justice system being overly friendly to rich white people does not seem to be in character goom.

This post was edited by SkySwallower on Apr 29 2025 01:51am
Member
Posts: 31,666
Joined: Dec 29 2016
Gold: 291,611.20
Warn: 10%
Apr 29 2025 02:16am
I think race should not play a role in most cases, unless it is relevant to the charges (i.e. a black man murdering a bunch of white people is more likely to be a hatecrime than if everybody had the same race).

I am a little confused by your post though. Since when are you aware and since when do you care that black people tend to get overly harsh sentences while white people, especially well connected, can e.g. rape an unconscious girl and walk free because of their otherwise bright future? You being critical of a two tiered justice system being overly friendly to rich white people does not seem to be in character goom.


Come on the facts of the case matter in every situation, in the one you cited the woman who passed out mid finger bang was all over that guy at a party for a school she didn't even attend, she was the older sister of a girl who did attend that college.
Obviously not a sexual assault.
That said yes its absolutely horrendous how people accused of rape are not permitted to have an effective and relevant defense in court.
Take this Madison brooks case for example.


These guys would be completely screwed like many other men surely were, if one of them didn't have presence of mind to record this nasty ass hoe, degrade the driver (The white guy) for not wanting sloppy seconds calling him gay.
Not on camera disoriented in any way, no slurred speech, or loss of balance, but they are prosecuting all of the men, alleging there was no possible way for her to be awake and aware when sexual activity took place.
They straight up got this hoe on camera getting mad after the driver said no and telling them to leave her there she will get someone else to pick her up.
Beyond belief they cannot question this woman's character in their defense, when its on fucking video.

This post was edited by PapaPsych on Apr 29 2025 02:18am
Member
Posts: 8,944
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 687.30
Apr 29 2025 06:00am
Come on the facts of the case matter in every situation, in the one you cited the woman who passed out mid finger bang was all over that guy at a party for a school she didn't even attend, she was the older sister of a girl who did attend that college.
Obviously not a sexual assault.
That said yes its absolutely horrendous how people accused of rape are not permitted to have an effective and relevant defense in court.
Take this Madison brooks case for example.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrdPhktfWis

These guys would be completely screwed like many other men surely were, if one of them didn't have presence of mind to record this nasty ass hoe, degrade the driver (The white guy) for not wanting sloppy seconds calling him gay.
Not on camera disoriented in any way, no slurred speech, or loss of balance, but they are prosecuting all of the men, alleging there was no possible way for her to be awake and aware when sexual activity took place.
They straight up got this hoe on camera getting mad after the driver said no and telling them to leave her there she will get someone else to pick her up.
Beyond belief they cannot question this woman's character in their defense, when its on fucking video.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Turner maybe refresh yourself on the facts? Or are you talking about a different white guy?
Member
Posts: 9,097
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Apr 29 2025 06:02am
https://alphanews.org/justice-no-longer-blind-in-hennepin-county-moriarty-orders-prosecutors-to-consider-race-in-plea-deals/

Starting today a new policy has gone into effect for prosecutors in the notorious Mary Moriarty led hennepin county courts.
It states:

>"Proposed resolutions should consider the person charged as a whole person, including their racial identity and age. While these factors should not be controlling, they should be part of the overall analysis. Racial disparities harm our community, lead to distrust, and have a negative impact on community safety. Prosecutors should be identifying and addressing racial disparities at decision points, as appropriate"

This formalizes the previously informal policy of giving suspects different treatment based on their skin color. The status quo ante was to make charging decisions different for black people and white people, asians and hispanics- but never ever admit to it. Its easy to just let go a serial offender on their 37th felony because they have the right skin color, but throw the book at a first time offender of the wrong skin color despite ample evidence exonerating them. Now that process is official policy: skin color is a determining factor in the charging process at the prosecutors office. Same prosecutors that let a convicted murderer walk with no prison time (right skin color!)




Minnesota been operating under this philosophy for a long time. I think you just showing it's now enshrined in Moriarty policy. Have multiple family anecdotes of this crap and couple personal. Worst was an incident involving my Uncle getting jumped by a 17 year old black size of a D2 lineman. My Uncles only mistake, defending himself. Minnesota even allows Mad Max road scenarios when they could tow and impound those
Member
Posts: 31,666
Joined: Dec 29 2016
Gold: 291,611.20
Warn: 10%
Apr 29 2025 01:47pm
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Turner maybe refresh yourself on the facts? Or are you talking about a different white guy?


That's the case you were talking about and yes 100% not rape.
There's an even more egregious case feminazi's protested about in Illinois until a judge was removed from the bench.
Where the 'victim' changed her story, lied, and perjured her self a bunch of times and the jury still came back with guilty, and the judge threw the guilty verdict out.
Member
Posts: 56,894
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
Apr 29 2025 04:17pm
is this better or worse than rationing out vaccines based on race? :rofl:
Member
Posts: 57,218
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
Apr 29 2025 04:42pm
Depends on the country
A handful of Asian countries are quite discriminatory towards foreigners.

I think it's more in line with the typical face that the mass population sees

In the US most people associate with white faces so non white faces are discriminated

In parts of South America they call you "Guero" if you're white.

I think darker skin folks just get the worst of it though since a majority of the human population lives in the northern hemisphere so it leads to more fair skin individuals.
Member
Posts: 8,944
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 687.30
Apr 30 2025 01:24am
That's the case you were talking about and yes 100% not rape.
There's an even more egregious case feminazi's protested about in Illinois until a judge was removed from the bench.
Where the 'victim' changed her story, lied, and perjured her self a bunch of times and the jury still came back with guilty, and the judge threw the guilty verdict out.


I mean the reason it was not rape was because he did not penetrate her with his dick. Good rule of thumb is you stop sexual activity when your partner is unconscious, especially (if that part of his defense is even true, his storys changed multiple times and contradict literally everybody elses testimony) if you just met. And this is in the best case i.e. the girl with 0.25% blood alcohol told him to finger her.

Also this part makes it seem very improbable she actually consented before becomming unconscious:

"Shortly before 1 a.m., Miller phoned her boyfriend and left a voicemail message, which later would be entered as evidence by the prosecution. The Palo Alto Weekly described it as "almost entirely incomprehensible". A juror later cited it as particularly strong evidence that she was not in a fit state to give consent.[53]"

A jury found him guilty because he very clearly is (not of rape since at the time fingering a person without consent was not considered rape), a judge who has ties to his university gave him an insanely light sentence - two tier justice system in action. I am still confused since when Goomshill cares about rich white people privilige though.

This post was edited by SkySwallower on Apr 30 2025 01:24am
Member
Posts: 31,666
Joined: Dec 29 2016
Gold: 291,611.20
Warn: 10%
Apr 30 2025 02:35am
I mean the reason it was not rape was because he did not penetrate her with his dick. Good rule of thumb is you stop sexual activity when your partner is unconscious, especially (if that part of his defense is even true, his storys changed multiple times and contradict literally everybody elses testimony) if you just met. And this is in the best case i.e. the girl with 0.25% blood alcohol told him to finger her.

Also this part makes it seem very improbable she actually consented before becomming unconscious:

"Shortly before 1 a.m., Miller phoned her boyfriend and left a voicemail message, which later would be entered as evidence by the prosecution. The Palo Alto Weekly described it as "almost entirely incomprehensible". A juror later cited it as particularly strong evidence that she was not in a fit state to give consent.[53]"

A jury found him guilty because he very clearly is (not of rape since at the time fingering a person without consent was not considered rape), a judge who has ties to his university gave him an insanely light sentence - two tier justice system in action. I am still confused since when Goomshill cares about rich white people privilige though.


Dude, your so full of it and won't listen to anything anyone has to say.
No matter what evidence is presented you are just a broken record, or a pull string doll that says "Wypipo Bad!"
Seriously, go move to a black neighborhood.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll