d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Classified Documents Case Dismissed
1237Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 20 2022
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jul 15 2024 10:54am
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jul 15 2024 11:16am
an even weaker case than the election finances angle which was also silly, but not as silly as the embellished his property value to get a loan victimless crime case.

"convicted felon" donald trump gets away with it again, when will the world be fair to someone who did the same horseshit every president in the modern era has also done. if nixon was smart he took a bunch of shit as collateral, prob the only reason he didnt get axed.
Member
Posts: 50,737
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,146.00
Jul 15 2024 11:50am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 15 2024 12:16pm)
an even weaker case than the election finances angle which was also silly, but not as silly as the embellished his property value to get a loan victimless crime case.

"convicted felon" donald trump gets away with it again, when will the world be fair to someone who did the same horseshit every president in the modern era has also done. if nixon was smart he took a bunch of shit as collateral, prob the only reason he didnt get axed.


The election finance case relied upon a catch 22 standard where every campaign expense by everyone is illegal if you have two mutually exclusive definitions of personal expenses
The documents case relied upon selective enforcement and charging only one person while ignoring everyone else doing even more flagrant violations with actual national security risks
Both cases relied upon contrived legal fictions that drastically reinterpreted existing law to torture them into an excuse to lock up Trump, law that never existed until they invented it just now
Member
Posts: 92,928
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jul 15 2024 12:13pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jul 15 2024 12:50pm)
The election finance case relied upon a catch 22 standard where every campaign expense by everyone is illegal if you have two mutually exclusive definitions of personal expenses
The documents case relied upon selective enforcement and charging only one person while ignoring everyone else doing even more flagrant violations with actual national security risks
Both cases relied upon contrived legal fictions that drastically reinterpreted existing law to torture them into an excuse to lock up Trump, law that never existed until they invented it just now


The loan case is still IMO the worst. if i loan you my lucky cricket and value it at 100$, then you give me 80$, and i pay you back 82$ as discussed a week later we're both now criminals.

at least the other two are just selective enforcement and legal reaching, the loans case is an absurd govt. overreach. the govts has no place telling banks what loans they can issue based on the value of collateral. the only basic legal theory basis i can even see for that is the govt backing the funds in said bank, but we've shown for a long time that the fed doesn't have much pull with banks unless they're forced to request a bailout.
Member
Posts: 57,229
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
Jul 15 2024 03:16pm
Judge appointed by defendant
Who could have seen that coming

No bias here
Member
Posts: 54,073
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jul 15 2024 05:00pm
Quote (Bruv @ 15 Jul 2024 23:16)
Judge appointed by defendant
Who could have seen that coming

No bias here

Are you ready to dismiss the New York campaign finance case based on the same logic, since it was led by a Dem-appointed judge in front of a jury selected from deep-blue NYC?
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Jul 15 2024 05:13pm
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/special-counsel-jack-smith-appeal-trump-classified-documents-case


So this will be appealed, but I don't believe Jack smith has any hope here. If trump wins the election, I believe this goes away no matter what. At this point Jack smith is just too late and to continue course is pretty dumbfounding.
Member
Posts: 57,229
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
Jul 15 2024 05:17pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 15 2024 05:00pm)
Are you ready to dismiss the New York campaign finance case based on the same logic, since it was led by a Dem-appointed judge in front of a jury selected from deep-blue NYC?


Never said anything about political parties here
Let me say this again since you missed it

A judge
Got appointed
By the guy she is judging
Case got dismissed

ololololo
Member
Posts: 15,802
Joined: Jul 31 2006
Gold: 24.06
Jul 15 2024 05:18pm
Quote (Bruv @ Jul 15 2024 05:17pm)
Never said anything about political parties here
Let me say this again since you missed it

A judge
Got appointed
By the guy she is judging
Case got dismissed

ololololo


Yes, run away from what was asked.

This post was edited by Landmine on Jul 15 2024 05:30pm
Member
Posts: 54,073
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jul 15 2024 05:30pm
Quote (Bruv @ 16 Jul 2024 01:17)
Never said anything about political parties here
Let me say this again since you missed it

A judge
Got appointed
By the guy she is judging
Case got dismissed

ololololo


In the hush money case, Trump was prosecuted by an AG who literally campaigned on getting Trump by any means necessary.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
1237Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll