d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Biden Title Ix
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 56,932
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
May 15 2024 11:40am
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/20-gop-led-states-sue-biden-administration-title-ix-rules-lgbtq-studen-rcna151247

Quote
Title IX was originally enacted in 1972 to prevent sex-based discrimination and sexual harassment in educational programs and activities funded by the federal government.

The lawsuits follow the Education Department’s expansion of Title IX federal civil rights rules last month, which will now include anti-discrimination protections for students on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Among other provisions, the new rules would prohibit schools from barring transgender students from using bathrooms, changing facilities and pronouns that correspond with their gender identities.

“The interpretation of the Biden administration is completely inconsistent with the statute and the way it’s been interpreted for decades,” Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said at a news conference Tuesday alongside Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey.


Title IX states:
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

Heard about this from the Lost Debate podcast, the co-host described it as:
Quote
Under the new interpretations, gender identity constitutes sex in the context of title IX, so that if a trans-woman wishes to participate in an activity that is exclusionary for men, and is told she cannot participate because she is trans, she could sue the school. Or if a professor refuses to use a person's chosen pronouns, that could be grounds to sue the school.


Pard has really been lacking on trans threads lately, so any hot takes on the matter?
Member
Posts: 92,929
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 15 2024 01:00pm
trans women becoming a female just to demand they get included in male spaces. the irony is at it's peak. then there's the concept of females not being able to crack into some male spaces, but a biological male getting the job done. now that's what i call feminism.

in reality i dont see many applications, but time will tell.
Member
Posts: 9,119
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
May 15 2024 01:20pm
If change is needed ought to be a vote by our elected representatives to include the gender identification verbiage and definitions. This cowboy rule expansion may swing the pendulum further back.
Member
Posts: 2,614
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 0.00
May 15 2024 02:39pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 15 2024 03:00pm)
trans women becoming a female just to demand they get included in male spaces. the irony is at it's peak. then there's the concept of females not being able to crack into some male spaces, but a biological male getting the job done. now that's what i call feminism.

in reality i dont see many applications, but time will tell.


Situations that never happen.
Member
Posts: 33,921
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
May 15 2024 04:21pm
Quote (blahaj @ May 15 2024 04:39pm)
Situations that never happen.


There was just a big lawsuit against a sorority because a trans-identifying individual was let into the house and was accused of s harassment.

It exists, but it's by no means common.

Member
Posts: 2,614
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 0.00
May 15 2024 05:29pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ May 15 2024 06:21pm)
There was just a big lawsuit against a sorority because a trans-identifying individual was let into the house and was accused of s harassment.

It exists, but it's by no means common.


You can find outliers with almost any examples, by no means does it justify bigotry to the minority as a whole
Member
Posts: 92,929
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 16 2024 06:16am
Quote (blahaj @ May 15 2024 05:29pm)
You can find outliers with almost any examples, by no means does it justify bigotry to the minority as a whole


i agree on bigotry, but does that also suggest this change to title IX is also unnecessary because there are only fringe examples?
Member
Posts: 2,614
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 0.00
May 16 2024 12:12pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 16 2024 08:16am)
i agree on bigotry, but does that also suggest this change to title IX is also unnecessary because there are only fringe examples?


Horribly bad faith response
Member
Posts: 92,929
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 16 2024 01:11pm
Quote (blahaj @ May 16 2024 12:12pm)
Horribly bad faith response


i dont even understand how it's bad faith lmao. im asking if the number of potential applicable cases is high enough to justify with recoding title ix.

and i fully acknowledge anti trans sentiment is driven by overexposure of niche cases nonrepresentative of most trans people.

do you think there are a legit number of cases this title ix recodification can actually be helpful for? when i first read the thread i tried to think of some and came up generally empty.
Member
Posts: 2,614
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 0.00
May 16 2024 03:34pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 16 2024 03:11pm)
i dont even understand how it's bad faith lmao. im asking if the number of potential applicable cases is high enough to justify with recoding title ix.

and i fully acknowledge anti trans sentiment is driven by overexposure of niche cases nonrepresentative of most trans people.

do you think there are a legit number of cases this title ix recodification can actually be helpful for? when i first read the thread i tried to think of some and came up generally empty.


It's bad faith because for every one bill protecting trans people there are 6 more trying to take the protections away, and you know that.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll