Quote (JessiWan @ Aug 26 2023 04:45am)
What do you think? Good idea or bad?
Personally, I feel that as technologies advance, more and more people should be freed from working. And we should have more and more of our needs met simply by virtue of being human. The wealth that is generated through the advancement of technology should be more equally shared among all humans, it shouldn't be concentrated in the hands of a few capitalists and mega-billionaires.
That said, I feel that people shouldn't get money, because this could cause inflation. Instead, I think governments should start purchasing agricultural lands, farm them to produce food, and then give said food to all the citizens. This would be one good way to start implementing something similar to universal basic income.
Your thoughts?
There's a reason why experienced farmers are successful. Giving farmland to randoms who's main source of sustenance is derived from Starbucks is probably a bad idea.
They tried collectivism multiple times. Probably a total 50 million peoplen starved to death. At a time where the global population was factors lower than what it is today.
In theory this is great. In practice this would cause rampant inflation and zero incentive for people thatbare already disillusioned.
Is there a better way than the current system? Probably. Is UBI it? Probably not.
If you want to improve the current system then go after the broken housing markets.
Populations increase but a lack of new homes creates scarcity and increases the value of existing property.
This becomes a cycle and leads to greater wealth inequality.
Governments are shit scared of addressing this because home owners tend to vote and no politician wants to reside over the housing market collapsing.
They have an unwritten contract with voters to maintain their property values and voters basically go along with governments shit performance and whatever bullshit they pull.
This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Aug 26 2023 05:43am