d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Christianity Is Obviously Fake
Prev13738394041274Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 54,735
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 7.83
Jan 19 2026 10:40pm
No it was always in the context of people using the bible as proof. The bible makes declarations and the people use those declarations as proof/justification for their god. Aka circular logic. Which obviously is incorrect


At this point I am going to have to ask if you can summarize my very first post of the meme to see how much you actually understood from that because you seem to be talking past me. And now you want to get me on some kind of technical gotcha to feel less bad about being illiterate.


circular logic is not necessarily incorrect, and that is a fallacy fallacy. The foundation of every worldview is actually necessarily self-referential, and Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem shows that when logic itself reaches its absolute limit of consistency and completeness at the self-reference level, which is absolutely coherent for the grounding of all logic being an eternal being with a will aka God
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 19 2026 11:34pm
The Devil will either convince you that you are either too sinful to approach the cross or that you have no need for the cross. I can see that he has done the latter with you.

You have money? That's wonderful. What charity do you donate to? Do you sponsor a child for World Vision? I know plenty of charities that would love to have your support. Perhaps you would like to start with NBCF?


No one approached me by the name of devil to convince me to not approach any crosses. I have arrived to this conclusion on my own. In fact its is almost always a Christian of some kind that tells me I am sinful and need to be saved etc. So not sure what you are talking about there. I haven't broken any laws and lead a good life at least by my standards don't see why I need to be saved.

Its none of your business what I do with my money but you can be sure it won't be anything to do with religion.

Also just had some time to read through your post on jesus genealogy

How does your research reconcile these 2 direct contradictions?

Matthew 1:15-16
15 and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, 16 and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.

Luke 3:23
Jesus was about thirty years old when he began his public ministry. Jesus was known as the son of Joseph. Joseph was the son of Heli.

I dont understand much of your confusing diagrams with arrows looks like I am talking to this guy



This post was edited by addone on Jan 19 2026 11:43pm
Member
Posts: 17,571
Joined: Mar 13 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 20 2026 12:22am
No one approached me by the name of devil to convince me to not approach any crosses. I have arrived to this conclusion on my own. In fact its is almost always a Christian of some kind that tells me I am sinful and need to be saved etc. So not sure what you are talking about there. I haven't broken any laws and lead a good life at least by my standards don't see why I need to be saved.

Its none of your business what I do with my money but you can be sure it won't be anything to do with religion.

Also just had some time to read through your post on jesus genealogy

How does your research reconcile these 2 direct contradictions?

Matthew 1:15-16
15 and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, 16 and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.

Luke 3:23
Jesus was about thirty years old when he began his public ministry. Jesus was known as the son of Joseph. Joseph was the son of Heli.

I dont understand much of your confusing diagrams with arrows looks like I am talking to this guy

https://imgur.com/YGR9pUJ.jpeg


You don't want diagrams? Alright, here is the explanation:

Deuteronomy 25:5-6 talks about the Levirate Marriage

5 If brothers are living together and one of them dies without a son, his widow must not marry outside the family. Her husband’s brother shall take her and marry her and fulfill the duty of a brother-in-law to her. 6 The first son she bears shall carry on the name of the dead brother so that his name will not be blotted out from Israel.

Matthan dies and so Estha marries Matthat. Matthan had a son, Jacob while Matthat had a son, Heli. Heli dies and so Heli’s Wife Marries Jacob as he and Heli are half-brothers. This is where Deuteronomy 25:5-6 applies and so Jacob’s son Joseph bears the name of the dead brother. Joseph also inherits the right to Marry Heli’s daughter Mary.
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 20 2026 02:18am
You don't want diagrams? Alright, here is the explanation:

Deuteronomy 25:5-6 talks about the Levirate Marriage

5 If brothers are living together and one of them dies without a son, his widow must not marry outside the family. Her husband’s brother shall take her and marry her and fulfill the duty of a brother-in-law to her. 6 The first son she bears shall carry on the name of the dead brother so that his name will not be blotted out from Israel.

Matthan dies and so Estha marries Matthat. Matthan had a son, Jacob while Matthat had a son, Heli. Heli dies and so Heli’s Wife Marries Jacob as he and Heli are half-brothers. This is where Deuteronomy 25:5-6 applies and so Jacob’s son Joseph bears the name of the dead brother. Joseph also inherits the right to Marry Heli’s daughter Mary.


This sounds like some kind of game of thrones love island type of shit. What a clusterfuck of a family. I am trying to follow this .. so levitate marriage involves brothers but how do you know Heli and Jacob were brothers since none of their families are related as far as I can see? Feels like this is next level mental gymnastics trying very hard to make a square peg fit into a round hole.

This post was edited by addone on Jan 20 2026 02:19am
Member
Posts: 17,251
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jan 20 2026 08:20am
Thats not what I asked for, thanks for proving my point.


Your point is that you didn't say things which you clearly did say, repeatedly. Those quotes are all still available in this thread as I have shown, but you continue to deny saying them.

You are lying openly. I'm not going to humor you if you are incapable of arguing in good faith.
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 20 2026 01:17pm
Your point is that you didn't say things which you clearly did say, repeatedly. Those quotes are all still available in this thread as I have shown, but you continue to deny saying them.

You are lying openly. I'm not going to humor you if you are incapable of arguing in good faith.


You never answered my simple question not now not then, because you know that you completely misunderstood a very straightforward meme. Now you are trying to save yourself the embarrassment and pawn it off on me.
You made a strawman in your head and you think i am arguing the same thing. The quotes were in line with my original post not your misapprehension. That is the definition of arguing in bad faith.
Member
Posts: 19,152
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
Jan 20 2026 01:28pm
You never answered my simple question not now not then, because you know that you completely misunderstood a very straightforward meme. Now you are trying to save yourself the embarrassment and pawn it off on me.
You made a strawman in your head and you think i am arguing the same thing. The quotes were in line with my original post not your misapprehension. That is the definition of arguing in bad faith.


Do you admit you personally don't know the truth behind life as we know it?
Member
Posts: 17,251
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Jan 20 2026 01:49pm
You never answered my simple question not now not then, because you know that you completely misunderstood a very straightforward meme. Now you are trying to save yourself the embarrassment and pawn it off on me.
You made a strawman in your head and you think i am arguing the same thing. The quotes were in line with my original post not your misapprehension. That is the definition of arguing in bad faith.


You're a bit of a space cadet. Explain to me how the post I quoted doesn't say that the Bible attempts to prove the existence of God, and I will answer your attempt to pivot away from this. If we can't agree that your words mean what they say we can't have a conversation.
Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 20 2026 02:05pm
Do you admit you personally don't know the truth behind life as we know it?


:rofl: "as we know it" :rofl:

more like

"as we were told by our cult"

If you are going to ask loaded questions like that don't expect me to take you seriously. This reeks desperation.



Member
Posts: 16,015
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Jan 20 2026 02:09pm
#19 – On What Day Did Jesus Die?
We know that Jesus died by crucifixion. However, on what day? In the Synoptic Gospels, Jesus is crucified on the day of Passover (Nisan 15), following the Last Supper, which is described as a Passover meal. This timeline situates Jesus' death after the Passover lambs were sacrificed.

In contrast, John’s Gospel places Jesus’ crucifixion on the day before Passover (Nisan 14), at the same time the Passover lambs were being slaughtered in preparation for the festival (John 19:14).

#20 – The High Priest Abiathar in Mark 2:26
Another biblical mistake comes from Mark 2:26, where Jesus references an event from 1 Samuel 21:1-6. In Mark’s account, Jesus recalls how David, in need of food, entered the house of God and ate the consecrated bread, “in the days of Abiathar the high priest.”

The problem lies in that, according to 1 Samuel, the high priest at the time of this event was Ahimelech, Abiathar’s father. Abiathar became high priest later, following Ahimelech’s death. This discrepancy has prompted much scholarly debate.

However, most critical scholars, unburdened by the radical understanding of inerrancy, see it as a simple error or misattribution by the author of Mark.

#21 – Was the Curtain in the Temple Torn Before or After Jesus’ Death?
There is another contradiction in the Bible related to Jesus’ death. It centers on the timing of the tearing of the temple curtain. In Matthew 27:50-51, the moment is described as happening immediately after Jesus' death: “And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, he gave up his spirit. At that moment, the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.”

However, in Luke’s account, a slight difference in the sequence arises. Luke 23:45 mentions the tearing of the curtain just before Jesus cries out: “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit.” This subtle shift in timing creates a discrepancy between Luke and the other Synoptic Gospels.
Understanding of inerrancy, see it as a simple error or misattribution by the author of Mark.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev13738394041274Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll