Should offensive realism not apply to Israel? Or just Russia?

I have no problem with it.

and everyone else is allowed to do it over the course of history, but Israel is different ?

if one country is initiating open war against another, claiming a land is just fine. a simple and effective punishment.

Not just punishment but better for dmz

i would prefer 250K + Palestinians dead on the first day after initiating October 7th.
second day if all Israeli hostages aren't coming back, an extra 100k.

after 3-4 days the round is sealed for the next decades.

if Nuclear was an option on ww2 for the Americans, the world can sit tight, cry out loud the way lefties and liberals always cry, and might just wait for Muslims to take control all around him.

this country will remain ours for good, and every other idiot who actually believes otherwise is deluding himself.

go on and give them your countries until they will seed EU over time and simply take control.

we are a tiny nuclear and forever to stay country. deal with it, lol.

il cya around in the next decade, on the next round like always, with hope for much higher numbers on the next cycle.

bb now

This post was edited by darksoho on Apr 7 2024 12:14pm

Ioffensive realism is simply a fact of life. while you might consider it should only apply to one country, by its very definition, realism, it applies globally.

Most sane Israeli ^

I don't agree with the theory, but if it is believed and does apply it must apply globally.
So why the derision of Israel but the acceptance of Russia?
Israel was literally invaded by Hamas.

Edit: btw its not a simple fact of life lol, its a theory to describe the behaviour of large powers.

This post was edited by Prox1m1ty on Apr 7 2024 12:22pm

Large powers
Hamas

Actually Israel is the power in this case, LOL