d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing Week
Prev19899100101102443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 21 2018 02:26am
Quote (Ghot @ 21 Sep 2018 09:23)
complete dodge


as expected...
Member
Posts: 104,575
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 21 2018 02:44am
Quote (fender @ Sep 21 2018 04:26am)
as expected...




There is zero proof. There is nothing buy hearsay, probably paid for. If you wanna walk around thinking the world is full of nice, happy people one and all, that's your choice.
We have photographic proof the Dems were paying people to disrupt the hearings. Yet here you are, thinking that after the hearings didn't go their way, they all became saints.

So like I said...

I'll wait till you come back to planet Earth.
Member
Posts: 49,654
Joined: Mar 19 2006
Gold: 7,092.89
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 21 2018 02:53am
so it's not just 'probably ficticious', but also 'probably paid for' now? when did the dems / soros / clintons pay her? back in 2012? so they are all risking their careers and safety to smear your 'good judge'? how much you reckon they had to pay her to be smeared, threatened, and shamed by the right? a couple of millions at least i'd hope - it's not like she's a porn star hired and paid off by trump, right?

talk about coming back to planet earth...
Member
Posts: 104,575
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 21 2018 03:11am
Quote (low-ki @ Sep 21 2018 04:51am)



Ah, but the truth will out. Nice find.



Quote (fender @ Sep 21 2018 04:53am)
so it's not just 'probably ficticious', but also 'probably paid for' now? when did the dems / soros / clintons pay her? back in 2012? so they are all risking their careers and safety to smear your 'good judge'? how much you reckon they had to pay her to be smeared, threatened, and shamed by the right? a couple of millions at least i'd hope - it's not like she's a porn star hired and paid off by trump, right?

talk about coming back to planet earth...



"back in 2012" is her story. I have seen no PROOF of the incident 35 years ago, or the 2012 claims.

During Kavanaugh's 3 day confirmation hearing the dems/left were caught paying people to disrupt the hearings. Iirc there were like 100 people arrested for the disruptions as well. I don't recall seeing you on PaRD during this reveal, but it is posted on PaRD.

Try to keep at least a somewhat open mind when you peruse this one of many articles...

https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/05/abortion-activists-caught-getting-paid-to-disrupt-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearings/


/e I would at least catch up on the PaRD posts before you start assuming things. ^^

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 21 2018 03:28am
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 21 2018 04:00am
Quote (Ghot @ 21 Sep 2018 10:11)
Ah, but the truth will out. Nice find.






"back in 2012" is her story. I have seen no PROOF of the incident 35 years ago, or the 2012 claims.

During Kavanaugh's 3 day confirmation hearing the dems/left were caught paying people to disrupt the hearings. Iirc there were like 100 people arrested for the disruptions as well. I don't recall seeing you on PaRD during this reveal, but it is posted on PaRD.

Try to keep at least a somewhat open mind when you peruse these articles...

https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/05/abortion-activists-caught-getting-paid-to-disrupt-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearings/


/e I would at least catch up on the PaRD posts before you start assuming things. ^^


i know it's probably a stupid thing to ask a roy moore supporter, but what would it take for you to acknowledge this should at least be properly INVESTIGATED? if being a person with a flawless reputation and no reason to lie about something like that isn't good enough, i guess anything short of video evidence and a confession probably wouldn't make you support the slightest delay of rushing your ultra partisan judge, who did his best to smear bill clinton, but is hell bent on protecting trump, to the highest court in the country.

and ofc you'd try to deflect with something completely irrelevant to the rape allegations. again, if your point is that those claims are all made up to smear your 'good judge' (way to keep an open mind) - what does SHE get out of it other than hate, being smeared and threatened by deranged cultists like yourself? what's her motive? how high would your imaginary payments have to be to risk your reputation and career like that? could you at least pretend you were ever trying to at least make sense of it from any perspective other than that of a completely biased trump cultist?



https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/life-news/

This post was edited by fender on Sep 21 2018 04:04am
Member
Posts: 104,575
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 21 2018 04:23am
Quote (fender @ Sep 21 2018 06:00am)
i know it's probably a stupid thing to ask a roy moore supporter, but what would it take for you to acknowledge this should at least be properly INVESTIGATED? if being a person with a flawless reputation and no reason to lie about something like that isn't good enough, i guess anything short of video evidence and a confession probably wouldn't make you support the slightest delay of rushing your ultra partisan judge, who did his best to smear bill clinton, but is hell bent on protecting trump, to the highest court in the country.

and ofc you'd try to deflect with something completely irrelevant to the rape allegations. again, if your point is that those claims are all made up to smear your 'good judge' (way to keep an open mind) - what does SHE get out of it other than hate, being smeared and threatened by deranged cultists like yourself? what's her motive? how high would your imaginary payments have to be to risk your reputation and career like that? could you at least pretend you were ever trying to at least make sense of it from any perspective other than that of a completely biased trump cultist?



https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/life-news/




Well, before the govt. spends millions investigating this probable crock of shyt, do ya think maybe they should talk to the accuser, since even IF it did happen, it's way past the statute of limitations.

On top of everything else, if Ford had wanted this investigated, she could have brought it up back in July when she sent the letter. Or again, during the confirmation hearing. Or do you think just maybe this all just a stalling technique by the left?

I'll never understand why people fall for this kind of flim flam.


On a side note, ya notice how those women accusing Roy Moore, dropped everything after he lost the election. No followup at all. Just coincidence ofc. LOL
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 21 2018 04:49am
Quote (Ghot @ 21 Sep 2018 11:23)
Well, before the govt. spends millions investigating this probable crock of shyt, do ya think maybe they should talk to the accuser, since even IF it did happen, it's way past the statute of limitations.

On top of everything else, if Ford had wanted this investigated, she could have brought it up back in July when she sent the letter. Or again, during the confirmation hearing. Or do you think just maybe this all just a stalling technique by the left?

I'll never understand why people fall for this kind of flim flam.


On a side note, ya notice how those women accusing Roy Moore, dropped everything after he lost the election. No followup at all. Just coincidence ofc. LOL


still defending pedo moore. with fake news that is, none of the roy moore accusers withdrew their stories afaik. what did they 'drop' in your opinion?
still not making ONE reasonable argument as to why someone would go through all that and risk their respectable career and reputation with false rape allegations.
still no answer what would convince you this should be investigated, guess i was right that you didn't even TRY to look at it from a perspective other than your own.
Member
Posts: 91,078
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Sep 21 2018 06:51am
Quote (fender @ Sep 21 2018 02:17am)
investigating this matter properly = 'destroying a good judges (so you KNOW he's innocent?) life' - i can tell you're totally not biased...

also, 'last minute' is a bit of a stretch considering he was only nominated recently. common sense would tell you that her accusations are probably NOT entirely made up: not only has she told a therapist about being raped back in 2012, she also has literally nothing to gain from this - if you assume she doesn't have a weird 'getting death threats from trump cultists, being dragged through the mud by 30% of the country, and slut-shamed by political hacks' fetish.
sure, based on what can be proven so far, republicans could still claim 'well, there was no 100% proof he did it', but that's why it has to be investigated. as a rational thinking human being with only a shred of decency you'd not just outright dismiss this and push for a vote.

then again, i'm not kidding myself into expecting you to have even an ounce of objectivity regarding this matter, let alone the ability to analyse this logically - just uncritically going along with the shameless and disgusting spins and character assassination attempts of the right is pretty much exactly what i expected from you anyway...


you realize of course they waited until after the hearing that was specifically designed to bring up questions like this, tho, right?
Member
Posts: 46,670
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Sep 21 2018 07:00am
So Kavanaugh's accuser rejected testifying on Monday and proposed testifying on Thursday.
I'm not an expert on esoteric senate rules and protocols, and I haven't read any detailed reporting on how it works yet, but I know that Kavanaugh has to be confirmed by the end of the week to be seated for oral arguments in the next SCOTUS term starting October 1st, a week from monday. So I am assuming that with Thursday hearings, it would be impossible to confirm Kavanaugh by the end of the senate's week. I don't know, are they in session friday? How much can democrats delay motions- the pick is still in the judiciary committee and has to go up for a full senate vote this week. I'm just assuming that with thursday testimony, it would delay kavanaugh that crucial week that prevents him from voting on cases this fall.

If that's true, then the bullshit-o-meter jumped from 11/10 to 20/10. How can democrats even maintain a fig leaf of pretense that the accuser is in good faith when they're engaging in such blatant delaying tactics to influence the court?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19899100101102443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll