Quote (Duckling @ Feb 25 2021 06:58am)

Nice sample size also crappy analogy you are giving.

Btw I’m sure I know more math than you

Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 25 2021 08:02am)

Lol sure you do buddy

Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 25 2021 08:00am)

lol face book doesnt and didnt allow that kind of talk on their platform questioning anything about the scamdemic. Its not his "view" thats the argument. Its the fact that he can have a "view" but no one else can.

Quote (kenw @ Feb 25 2021 05:11am)

You can have your misinformed opiniokln on Telegram or whatever incestuous shithole your brethren reside in currently. Facebook isn't obliged to tolerate propaganda.

Quote (Duckling @ Feb 25 2021 07:03am)

I mean you just gave the shittiest analogy using a sample size that doesn’t even allow for any empirical result.

Also, I like how you think the branch of math we use for interpretation and insights ... ie the one that can be skewed because of data, implies all other branches are subjective. Lmfao, worst scientist ever you are

Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 25 2021 08:16am)

20 is more than though to do meaningful statistics. I could have said 5000 points and it wouldn't have changed the analogy in a meaningful way.

Your second sentence I already explicitly denied. Mall cop fails at reading comprehension to nobody's surprise

Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 25 2021 08:15am)

you can cry all you want zucker is a hypocrite fraud like all you lefties. censorship is what fascists do and you just said your cool with it. he aint old yet but hes richhhhhhhhhhhhhh and WHYTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/feb/17/mark-zuckerberg-violating-own-policy-early-vaccine/

Quote (kenw @ Feb 25 2021 05:25am)

Lol, I'm the one who is crying? Have you seen your posts?

Quote (Duckling @ Feb 25 2021 07:17am)

Lmfao ... the sample size does matter but not in your trash analogy

Also you think I didn’t recognize your pathetic attempt to switch math and statistics as if they’re synonymous. You’re a cuck

Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 24 2021 09:02pm)

Then you have no problems, because what is being discussed in what was linked is exactly what I was talking about. They aren't saying 2+2=4 is subjective, they're saying conclusions drawn from math are subjective.

Have you ever seen somebody tell you "Math says blacks have a lower IQ". That's what's being targeted. People trying to use math as a way to lend a lens of objectivity to their conclusions.