d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Election Was Rigged, Trap Was Set, Its Coming
Prev19819829839849851965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 6,465
Joined: Nov 16 2008
Gold: 63.70
Feb 25 2021 05:00am
Quote (kenw @ Feb 25 2021 10:59am)
You are such an imbecile lol

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, celebrated the ruling on Facebook, saying the state "had a free and fair election -- that's a fact.""

Is your brain wired properly? Or perhaps are you dyslexic? Does it say the Facebook ruling? Did you bother going on his Facebook page to see what he wrote. This is the problem with you people: terrible reading comprehension and you seldom do proper research. And when you do actually make an effort, if the general consensus is like 90%, you'll always opt for the 10%. It's insanity please finish your GED and get psychiatric treatment - you'd ameliorate your quality of life tenfold . Thank me later.


'fair and free' election is NOT a fact, only in your bubble is that a fact
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Feb 25 2021 05:05am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 25 2021 02:16am)
what do you make of this kenw?
you cant question this because it "conspiracy theory" but its ok for zucker to do it???

gasp....................but its a conspiracy theory?

Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg admits he does NOT know if Covid-19 vaccine is safe
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5XoZjJagWSlG/


And what shitty reporting but that's not atypical for that platform . You made me endure that video and they don't even show what he had said lol .
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Feb 25 2021 05:08am
Quote (darkhead69 @ Feb 25 2021 06:00am)
'fair and free' election is NOT a fact, only in your bubble is that a fact


It all points that it was unless you can prove that there was widespread voter fraud. I'm not talking about a couple instances of 100 votes or miniscule clerical errors.

And no Lindell isn't proof and SuitcaseGate isn't proof. I know how your mind works by now. :D

This post was edited by kenw on Feb 25 2021 05:10am
Member
Posts: 47,258
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 25 2021 06:06am
Quote (kenw @ Feb 25 2021 02:59am)
You are such an imbecile lol

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, celebrated the ruling on Facebook, saying the state "had a free and fair election -- that's a fact.""

Is your brain wired properly? Or perhaps are you dyslexic? Does it say the Facebook ruling? Did you bother going on his Facebook page to see what he wrote. This is the problem with you people: terrible reading comprehension and you seldom do proper research. And when you do actually make an effort, if the general consensus is like 90%, you'll always opt for the 10%. It's insanity please finish your GED and get psychiatric treatment - you'd ameliorate your quality of life tenfold . Thank me later.


ok, where does it say the ruling is from?
Member
Posts: 47,258
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 25 2021 06:10am
Quote (kenw @ Feb 25 2021 03:05am)
And what shitty reporting but that's not atypical for that platform . You made me endure that video and they don't even show what he had said lol .


it starts at the 15 second mark. its easy to tell were it starts cause we can see his face talking. Ends at 0:34. perhaps you had a cognitive black out. :)
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Feb 25 2021 06:25am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 25 2021 07:06am)
ok, where does it say the ruling is from?


Are you slow? The first three words of the article are "the Supreme Court" - just stop lol. It's like I'm talking to a toddler sometimes.
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Feb 25 2021 06:33am
Quote (TiStuff @ Feb 25 2021 07:10am)
it starts at the 15 second mark. its easy to tell were it starts cause we can see his face talking. Ends at 0:34. perhaps you had a cognitive black out. :)


Oh I see I thought it was verbatim so I just skipped through . Btw this is your typical propaganda piece. He had said this in July however in November he had a change of heart after doing more research. I would agree with you and call out the hypocrisy if he hadn't changed his July viewpoint but since it's not the case, this is yet merely another bitchute tabloid piece with a sensationalist headline. :)

This post was edited by kenw on Feb 25 2021 06:34am
Member
Posts: 47,258
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 25 2021 06:55am
Quote (kenw @ Feb 25 2021 04:25am)
Are you slow? The first three words of the article are "the Supreme Court" - just stop lol. It's like I'm talking to a toddler sometimes.


a toddler indeed, what was the ruling?
Member
Posts: 129,919
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 17,050.69
Feb 25 2021 06:58am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 24 2021 10:19pm)
They are lol

There is no statistical test that spits out "significant" and you don't have to think further than that. You always have to account for real world circumstances when interpreting your data.

Let's say I get in my car and push on the accelerator, and write down my speed every 5 seconds. For a full 20 samples my speed increases. Based on this data, if conclusions drawn from math are objective, you can only conclude that my car slowing down is an impossibility as long as I have my foot on the accelerator. After all, 100% of samples resulted in an increase from the previous.

This is of course ridiculous, because you aren't accounting for real-world factors that influenced the gathering of your statistics, and it's up to you to make a subjective judgement of what is important. Is the number of trees I drove by important? No, I don't think so. Is the amount of gas in my tank important? I'd say very.

Thinking that conclusions drawn from statistics are objective is something that people with very little statistical training tend to do, and basically nobody with any real understanding of statistics ever does.



Nice sample size also crappy analogy you are giving.

Btw I’m sure I know more math than you
Member
Posts: 47,258
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 25 2021 07:00am
Quote (kenw @ Feb 25 2021 04:33am)
Oh I see I thought it was verbatim so I just skipped through . Btw this is your typical propaganda piece. He had said this in July however in November he had a change of heart after doing more research. I would agree with you and call out the hypocrisy if he hadn't changed his July viewpoint but since it's not the case, this is yet merely another bitchute tabloid piece with a sensationalist headline. :)


lol face book doesnt and didnt allow that kind of talk on their platform questioning anything about the scamdemic. Its not his "view" thats the argument. Its the fact that he can have a "view" but no one else can.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19819829839849851965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll