it's funny. it reminds me a lot of those religious kook doomsday believers. once the day has passed, they just choose a new date as if nothing happened (er and didn't which should shake any reasonable persons belief)

This post was edited by proccy on Feb 24 2021 08:51pm

Obviously subjectivity will be in every opinion/conclusion lol...But that doesn't make the math used to get there not objective....

Oh I'm aware that he's going to swiftly sweep it under the rug, but I'll be here to pester him about yet another failed prediction/lie once again.

Yeah, cognitive dissonance at its finest.

Then you have no problems, because what is being discussed in what was linked is exactly what I was talking about. They aren't saying 2+2=4 is subjective, they're saying conclusions drawn from math are subjective.

Have you ever seen somebody tell you "Math says blacks have a lower IQ". That's what's being targeted. People trying to use math as a way to lend a lens of objectivity to their conclusions.

I've concluded that you are a moron. I like how the "research scientist" is saying that conclusions drawn from math are subjective. Lmfao, you need to phone bill nye

They are lol

There is no statistical test that spits out "significant" and you don't have to think further than that. You always have to account for real world circumstances when interpreting your data.

Let's say I get in my car and push on the accelerator, and write down my speed every 5 seconds. For a full 20 samples my speed increases. Based on this data, if conclusions drawn from math are objective, you can only conclude that my car slowing down is an impossibility as long as I have my foot on the accelerator. After all, 100% of samples resulted in an increase from the previous.

This is of course ridiculous, because you aren't accounting for real-world factors that influenced the gathering of your statistics, and it's up to you to make a subjective judgement of what is important. Is the number of trees I drove by important? No, I don't think so. Is the amount of gas in my tank important? I'd say very.

Thinking that conclusions drawn from statistics are objective is something that people with very little statistical training tend to do, and basically nobody with any real understanding of statistics ever does.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 24 2021 09:20pm

I’d say your study was severely flawed from the getgo as you failed to start the car, the speedometer thus wasn’t functioning which begs the question; how did you get your data?

This post was edited by DrFaGgIt on Feb 24 2021 09:43pm

Lying again, chief. It's such a meme that the tabloid newspaper didn't even mention it on the front page.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-child-porn-shock-australia/