I can vouch this, Santara has been pretty consistent in complaining that snopes is politically biased. I mean, it's dumb, but it's consistently dumb.

earpiece or not 71% of the association of american physicians and surgeons think there are serious issues with the se(c)retary's health. almost as bad as the totally different system she used for classified info (which she is unable to identify)

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillarys-health-concerns-serious-say-most-doctors-polled-by-the-association-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-aaps-300325065.html

Concerns about Hillary Clinton's health are "serious—could be disqualifying for the position of President of the U.S.," say nearly 71% of 250 physicians responding to an informal internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). About 20% said concerns were "likely overblown, but should be addressed as by full release of medical records." Only 2.7% responded that they were "just a political attack.

is anyone here actually excited about hillary? she has zero charisma

lol, a conservatively biased group can't even agree with this stupid narrative, how sad is your life?

As dumb as hiring a leftist fact-checker?

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/

Oh, well, if they have a 'leftist' working for them then never mind. I feel pretty silly now.

When they're unapologetic about it, you should feel silly.

Dat liberal bias that reality has.

When they unapologetically have one person working for them who is a liberal then they're obviously completely biased across the board obvs