Not a statistical argument.

Omar Mateen's massacre wouldn't have happened if this were in place.

why posting that no-sense instead of arguing ?
why acting like a donkey ? Do you know the story behind this caricature ?

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Jan 29 2017 12:22pm

Are you purposely being daft?

Every single country included in the ban is in turmoil besides Iran. Iran is included in that list because of Israels/Sunni Arabs pandering. I challenge you to google current events & conflicts in those countries and you will see how glaringly obvious it is. I mean are you really that detached from reality to not understand why people coming from Syria, Iraq, Lybia, Yemen could be a danger? Those places are active war zones with a flavor of militant Islam that blames the west, why wouldn't we want to take a second and make sure our vetting is sufficient? Why are people so vocal in fighting this when we look at places like France and see attack after attack by Islamist extremists that would love to do the same to their arch nemesis the US.

But its not french retardism, its quintessential british. And its very (most likely unintentionally) ironic when applied to Trump, since Gillray was mocking how the press was being sycophantically adoring, when modern treatment of trump draws such a 'fashionable contrast'

everything is here
- orange, small hands & overweigh trump
- long feets & terrible shoes t.may usually have
- UK in serious need to get new partner...
it's a terrible caricature, disgusting, maybe the "best" i saw ever, and very british yep.






This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Jan 29 2017 12:56pm

Now I'm not so sure you have any clue what Gillray's cartoon was about
Not sure if retard... or just french.

sounds more like a butthurt
the caricature shows exactly what i said in my previous post, "shocking".

Gillray was a british political cartoonist, basically the father of the art, who created the famous cartoon called "Fashionable Contrasts". It was ridiculing how the media of his present day was being ridiculously adoring of the duchess and fawning over her, particularly idolizing her petite frame and tiny feet, her most well known feature. Hence his cartoon wasn't simply mocking her small feet, but was directed at how she was being represented in the media, drawing that distinct british strain of irreverence by showing her small elegant feet getting rammed by the duke.

Trump is quite the opposite ridiculed as having small hands and being crucified by the media, so the context of the historical parallel is quite ironic, something thats both lost on you and the guy at the guardian who drew it.