except there are rules against stopping a "process/proceeding" in our laws. he tried to break them.
And he tried to override 81 million US citizen's votes. That's a big issue to me.

No there wasn’t rules. That’s why they had to change the law. Democrat party might as well be a bunch of toddlers.

there is no law that prohibits the president from ignoring the vote?
thats odd

Judge just set trumps trial date one day before Super Tuesday. Tell me r that’s not corruption.

Nice try, but when the indictments come in exactly 24 hrs after each time republicans make a statement that hurts Hunter the doj’s credibility is out the window. I get one offs, but when it’s every time there is no one off. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a liar or an idiot.

This post was edited by Landmine on Aug 28 2023 10:41am

full stop, so now you think they're sitting on Trump indictments to be released after Hunter biden statements? Trump cases are basically just pocket sand?

"cocaine found in the white house" (release the DC case)

"hunter biden makes a soft plea deal" (release the georgia case)

"leaked hunter / china texts" (release that Trump's twitter was subpoenaed)

like that?

That’s exactly what has happened. It’s not a one off if it happens every single time. It’s like me slapping someone every single time they say hello and then saying no that’s just a coincidence…



https://nypost.com/2023/08/26/biden-staffers-met-with-special-counsel-jack-smiths-aides-before-trump-indictment/amp/



This post was edited by Landmine on Aug 28 2023 11:03am

so, just to get this clear, you believe that the Biden whitehouse should not at all meet with the DOJ because of a conflict of interest? even though the executive branch runs the doj.