d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1969970971972973983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 7 2021 09:08am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 7 Oct 2021 11:02)
Obama was a generational political talent who got to the WH before he was ready, resulting in a presidency which wasted almost all of the potential it had. He also benefitted from running against Hillary, a uniquely loathsome individual who wouldn't even have made it out of county-level politics without the connection to her popular husband.





Regarding the "DeSantis should wait another cycle"-argument that both you and ^thundercock brought up: I'm not sure this argument is convincing. There is no guarantee whatsoever that his brand of being "Trump-lite" or the stand-in for "trumpism without Trump" will be in as much demand in 2028 as it will be in 2024, particularly in case Democrats win the presidential race in 2024 (which they would presumably be favored to do if Trump is the nominee again). Say Trump runs again in 2024, loses again - wouldn't that be the point when the party actually moves away from trumpism and goes either the Tom Cotton or the Nikki Hayley route?

DeSantis is not a political rockstar whose time will come sooner or later no matter what. I genuinely don't believe that his stock will ever be higher than in 2022-24. Yes, it would be super risky to go against Trump in the 2024 primary, but I believe that his presidential ambitions are toast either way if he doesn't seize the moment. What does he have to lose by that point?


i think tcock and I agreed that it might be best to wait a cycle. it depends entirely on circumstances outside his own choice.

if Trump doesn’t run, quietly (or loudly) tells Desantis he will back him, and Biden doesnt run again (or the harris/biden admin keeps flopping on everything), then he should absolutely give it a go

running against Trump in a primary would not be a prudent decision. Nor would attempting to defeat an incumbent that still has enough backing. defeating an incumbent in any form down now takes an unforced error by said incumbent (“no new taxes” GHWB 1992) or more recently, a near-unified, calculated, massively overreaching effort by all of his party and large swathes of the opposition party to do so. we saw this just last year in 2020 from the “fortifying of the election”

This post was edited by excellence on Oct 7 2021 09:12am
Member
Posts: 92,911
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 7 2021 09:16am
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 15 2021 11:10pm)
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/15/us/politics/durham-michael-sussmann-trump-russia.html

John Durham's oversight probe into the probe into the 2016 election is said to be about to indict a top lawyer at Perkins Coie, Michael Sussmann, on charges he lied to the FBI.



They've empaneled a grand jury to seek the indictment, and grand juries indict 100% of the time unless the prosecutors are literally telling the grand jury not to indict him, so its a given.



Any of this give you stinky parallels to the 2020 election? Donald Trump's lawyers pushing bullshit stories of election rigging and voting machine tampering and whatnot, trying to bullshit their way through the courts, and then facing repercussions for pushing their BS? Except in this case, Hillary Clinton's team wasn't content to just sow their bullshit seed in the fertile grounds of the media that welcomed it, they wanted to stir up the FBI and push the russiaburger narrative to dog Trump as part of crossfire hurricane, to use the FBI to spy on him and obstruct his campaign and later presidency.
But here we are: They kept the receipts. Hillary Clinton's little gambit to cast doubt on the election and spread misinformation through proxies was exposed because folks like Sussman don't work for free. He billed it right to Hillary Clinton.


That's the thing about Hillary's little opposition research manufacturing (since they couldn't find real dirt) operation with the Steele Dossier. She tried to give herself a distance with financial obfuscation to the point of plausible deniability, but her minions wouldn't work for free, so the money trial leads right back to #1. Contacts in the Kremlin being paid with Clintonbucks, lawyers pretending they are just conducting apolitical conversations with the FBI to feed their investigation into Trump, except they're still being paid in Clintonbucks by the hour.



Honestly, this is the kind of operation Durham should throw the book at. Bring the hammer down, take them to Chinatown.
Perkins Coie was little more than a veneer of legal titling thrown over a political hatchet job operation, a group of political operatives who tried to misreport their activities as "legal services" so they wouldn't be accountable to the FEC and public disclosure rules. As long as anyone can claim they are a lawyer providing legal services, they can go conduct all the dirty ops on behalf of a political campaign and not have to report where the money goes. That legal fiction needs to be brought down and made an example of.


HRC exploited the FISA court system's loophole of lack of evidence requirements standard courts would need. Then peddled the RUSSIA DID THIS stories to the media, and as a result recounts and other legal actions were still not pursued. (= BAD)

Trump's team pushed shit stories and wound people of to physical violence, as well as filing frivolous cases to save face, same BS push to the media, and resulted in real court cases and recounts. (= BAD BAD)

HRC just found a way to save face without involving the courts and legal process, imo even with her massive ego she's able to take an L far better than Trump.
Member
Posts: 54,061
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 7 2021 09:18am
Quote (excellence @ 7 Oct 2021 17:08)
i think tcock and I agreed that it might be best to wait a cycle. it depends entirely on circumstances outside his own choice.

if Trump doesn’t run, quietly (or loudly) tells Desantis he will back him, and Biden doesnt run again then (or the harria/biden admin keeps flopping on everything) he should absolutely give it a go


Maybe I'm indeed totally out of touch with the GOP primary electorate, but I really believe that DeSantis could win a contested primary against Trump if all the non-Trump forces in the party rally around him.
It will of course depend on how strong Trump's position is, going into the primaries. The poll I posted suggests that Trump is not insurmountable and that his support is starting to erode slightly but crucially.


To reiterate: what does DeSantis have to lose by that point? He'll be termed out as governor in 2026, he will most likely not be able to parachute to the Senate since both of Florida's seats are blocked with Rubio/Scott for the foreseeable future, and by that time, he's also too old and lacking seniority to have a good career in the House. And if he ends his political career and cashes out via a consultant/lobbyist job, a presidential run will only increase his profile.



Another option that I see is DeSantis becoming Trump's running mate if Biden/Harris look so vulnerable that even a Trump redux has a decent chance of defeating them.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 7 2021 09:18am
Member
Posts: 92,911
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 7 2021 09:20am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Oct 7 2021 10:18am)
Maybe I'm indeed totally out of touch with the GOP primary electorate, but I really believe that DeSantis could win a contested primary against Trump if all the non-Trump forces in the party rally around him.
It will of course depend on how strong Trump's position is, going into the primaries. The poll I posted suggests that Trump is not insurmountable and that his support is starting to erode slightly but crucially.


To reiterate: what does DeSantis have to lose by that point? He'll be termed out as governor in 2026, he will most likely not be able to parachute to the Senate since both of Florida's seats are blocked with Rubio/Scott for the foreseeable future, and by that time, he's also too old and lacking seniority to have a good career in the House. And if he ends his political career and cashes out via a consultant/lobbyist job, a presidential run will only increase his profile.



Another option that I see is DeSantis becoming Trump's running mate if Biden/Harris look so vulnerable that even a Trump redux has a decent chance of defeating them.


good fucking luck to any candidate. watching Graham and even Trump get booed just for saying "you have a choice to do what u want but i got vaccinated so think about it" has me thinking its a hell of a pain to walk the knife's edge they sharpened the past 10 or so years.
Member
Posts: 15,407
Joined: Mar 15 2011
Gold: 252.00
Oct 7 2021 09:32am
Its more important than ever to keep republicans out of office, please get out and vote all!!!
Member
Posts: 50,707
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Oct 7 2021 09:38am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 7 2021 10:16am)
HRC exploited the FISA court system's loophole of lack of evidence requirements standard courts would need. Then peddled the RUSSIA DID THIS stories to the media, and as a result recounts and other legal actions were still not pursued. (= BAD)

Trump's team pushed shit stories and wound people of to physical violence, as well as filing frivolous cases to save face, same BS push to the media, and resulted in real court cases and recounts. (= BAD BAD)

HRC just found a way to save face without involving the courts and legal process, imo even with her massive ego she's able to take an L far better than Trump.


The thing is, HRC and her campaign had very little capacity to force the FBI to do anything. Even when it came to making materially misleading statements to the FBI by pretending to not be affiliated with her campaign as they constructed their Russiaburger story. Its still 99% of the responsibility being shouldered for the FBI for the fact they intentionally subverted the supposed safeguards on domestic spying by using circular FISA evidence, doctoring evidence presented to judges, unmasking Flynn, and all the things we don't even know about that didn't get exposed. Its the FBI and its leadership that had Comey roleplaying a Le Carre novel as he set up absurd entrapment schemes to weaponize the FBI against the NSA and authorized a wild goose chase to pursue baseless politically motivated conspiracy theories in the first place.
Trump's team, when put in the same situation, took the exact opposite tact. They shut down all politically motivated investigations even to the point of erring on the side of caution when it came to obvious and provable cases of crimes being committed by officials like. Ilhan Omar. Bill Barr made it very clear that the DoJ would simply quash anything even resembling the Comey/McCabe era. So when they had the opportunity to engage in a tit-for-tat Hoover-style persecution of their political opponents and wield the powers of state to persecute them like they themselves were persecuted, they didn't do it.

Maybe theres some equivalency to be drawn by misrepresentations of HRC's team to the FBI, and the Trump team's misrepresentation to the courts about the election. But honestly in both cases they are very small offenses that have no real importance in the grander scheme. It was the FBI/DoJ under Obama that was willing to engage in all kinds of blatant misconduct and shenanigans, and it was the Trump supporting chuds who briefly emulated the George Floyd rioters. You can blame the FBI for its misconduct, you can blame the Trump supporters for their misconduct, but its not really the fault of HRC's campaign that the FBI was so corrupt (and not just in favor of HRC, more self-serving opportunism) and its not the fault of Trump's team that his supporters waltzed into the capital. People are responsible for their own actions, not able to blame it on some tangentially related statement or irresponsible prose or rhetoric that was told to them. And in both cases, it was their own allied team that got burned. Trump definitely didn't benefit from his supporters making clowns of themselves, and HRC was ready to have Comey get droned after making her investigation public.
Member
Posts: 92,911
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 7 2021 09:48am
Quote (Goomshill @ Oct 7 2021 10:38am)
The thing is, HRC and her campaign had very little capacity to force the FBI to do anything. Even when it came to making materially misleading statements to the FBI by pretending to not be affiliated with her campaign as they constructed their Russiaburger story. Its still 99% of the responsibility being shouldered for the FBI for the fact they intentionally subverted the supposed safeguards on domestic spying by using circular FISA evidence, doctoring evidence presented to judges, unmasking Flynn, and all the things we don't even know about that didn't get exposed. Its the FBI and its leadership that had Comey roleplaying a Le Carre novel as he set up absurd entrapment schemes to weaponize the FBI against the NSA and authorized a wild goose chase to pursue baseless politically motivated conspiracy theories in the first place.
Trump's team, when put in the same situation, took the exact opposite tact. They shut down all politically motivated investigations even to the point of erring on the side of caution when it came to obvious and provable cases of crimes being committed by officials like. Ilhan Omar. Bill Barr made it very clear that the DoJ would simply quash anything even resembling the Comey/McCabe era. So when they had the opportunity to engage in a tit-for-tat Hoover-style persecution of their political opponents and wield the powers of state to persecute them like they themselves were persecuted, they didn't do it.

Maybe theres some equivalency to be drawn by misrepresentations of HRC's team to the FBI, and the Trump team's misrepresentation to the courts about the election. But honestly in both cases they are very small offenses that have no real importance in the grander scheme. It was the FBI/DoJ under Obama that was willing to engage in all kinds of blatant misconduct and shenanigans, and it was the Trump supporting chuds who briefly emulated the George Floyd rioters. You can blame the FBI for its misconduct, you can blame the Trump supporters for their misconduct, but its not really the fault of HRC's campaign that the FBI was so corrupt (and not just in favor of HRC, more self-serving opportunism) and its not the fault of Trump's team that his supporters waltzed into the capital. People are responsible for their own actions, not able to blame it on some tangentially related statement or irresponsible prose or rhetoric that was told to them. And in both cases, it was their own allied team that got burned. Trump definitely didn't benefit from his supporters making clowns of themselves, and HRC was ready to have Comey get droned after making her investigation public.


Russia set up literal troll farms to influence the 2016 election, even recent studies show like 99/100 "christain" Facebook groups are run by foreign intel ghost agencies. did it win it for trump, idk, honestly i doubt it full on swung anything, but it certainly played a part, was targeted at the election specifically, and has contributed to domestic unrest since, and continues to go largely unpunished. perhaps cant even be stopped, idk.

Trump's campaigns claims, top to bottom, are utter bullshit. not even close to anything credible just a big stinking pile of horseshit.

Obama's FBI/DOJ certainly deserves scorn, but at least they had a puff of smoke to go looking for fire. and where was Trump's push to change FISA courts? where are the sweeping transparency gains in FBI/CIA/DOJ behavior? Trump literally asked his VP to not endorse the legal electoral votes, called him out on twitter as being too weak to do what's needed, and fanned flames for months thereafter until Powell/Guiliani's claims were so transparently hollow he couldn't anymore. Didn't correct himself, just stopped.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 7 2021 09:49am
Member
Posts: 33,920
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 7 2021 10:03am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 7 2021 11:48am)
Russia set up literal troll farms to influence the 2016 election, even recent studies show like 99/100 "christain" Facebook groups are run by foreign intel ghost agencies. did it win it for trump, idk, honestly i doubt it full on swung anything, but it certainly played a part, was targeted at the election specifically, and has contributed to domestic unrest since, and continues to go largely unpunished. perhaps cant even be stopped, idk.

Trump's campaigns claims, top to bottom, are utter bullshit. not even close to anything credible just a big stinking pile of horseshit.

Obama's FBI/DOJ certainly deserves scorn, but at least they had a puff of smoke to go looking for fire. and where was Trump's push to change FISA courts? where are the sweeping transparency gains in FBI/CIA/DOJ behavior? Trump literally asked his VP to not endorse the legal electoral votes, called him out on twitter as being too weak to do what's needed, and fanned flames for months thereafter until Powell/Guiliani's claims were so transparently hollow he couldn't anymore. Didn't correct himself, just stopped.


The Russian facebook groups had a reach of about 10,000 people.

The God Emperor Trump facebook page meanwhile had a reach of a million.

CNN has a reach of several tens of millions. You couldnt be more wrong about the scale.

Agreed about Trump being desultory.
Member
Posts: 92,911
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 7 2021 10:06am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 7 2021 11:03am)
The Russian facebook groups had a reach of about 10,000 people.

The God Emperor Trump facebook page meanwhile had a reach of a million.

CNN has a reach of several tens of millions. You couldnt be more wrong about the scale.

Agreed about Trump being desultory.


lol wut. the dissemination of the memes and shit those farms churned out was pretty wild.

the difficult thing to measure is influence on a causal scale, likely impossible. the reach of the troll farms isnt and wasnt a nonissue.
Member
Posts: 54,061
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Oct 7 2021 10:10am
Quote (thesnipa @ 7 Oct 2021 17:48)
Russia set up literal troll farms to influence the 2016 election, even recent studies show like 99/100 "christain" Facebook groups are run by foreign intel ghost agencies. did it win it for trump, idk, honestly i doubt it full on swung anything, but it certainly played a part, was targeted at the election specifically, and has contributed to domestic unrest since, and continues to go largely unpunished. perhaps cant even be stopped, idk.

Trump's campaigns claims, top to bottom, are utter bullshit. not even close to anything credible just a big stinking pile of horseshit.

Obama's FBI/DOJ certainly deserves scorn, but at least they had a puff of smoke to go looking for fire. and where was Trump's push to change FISA courts? where are the sweeping transparency gains in FBI/CIA/DOJ behavior? Trump literally asked his VP to not endorse the legal electoral votes, called him out on twitter as being too weak to do what's needed, and fanned flames for months thereafter until Powell/Guiliani's claims were so transparently hollow he couldn't anymore. Didn't correct himself, just stopped.


From the moment Trump fired Comey, it was politically impossible for him or his admin to push for any further structural changes in the intelligence community - any such attempt would have been framed by Democrats and the media as an attempt to intimidate his investigators/tamper with evidence.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1969970971972973983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll