Dude, of almost anybody on this forum you have the least room to criticize.

reducing emission pollution would have a same or different effect on acid rain and global warming?

Criticize about what? You going to spout out how more intelligent you are because you spent more time studying chemistry and how that made you a paragon among men? How none can paramount your intellectual existence and how the humanities and other sub-category studies pale in the face of your scientific theories and laws, the language of which defined and constructed through many years of the arts, reason honed arguments not only being relateable to science?



Emissions are the cause and effect of two things, but that does not mean that one effect is the cause of the other effect.

This post was edited by ChrisKz on Jan 26 2017 03:27pm

typical english major.

Yep. Can't even figure out a simple statement so he just starts spouting contrived bullshit.

I won't lie I do like making things longer than they need to be.

It's much harder to make things shorter than to make them longer.

At any rate, you can't talk about global warming's effects on reefs without also talking about acid rain, since one contributes to the other both directly and as a result of the same pollution sources.

tldr

this your dating profile headline?

Hmm, yeah.
You can filter out most of the sulphur to avoid acid rain.. but then you still have the greenhouse gasses being released..