Quote (addone @ May 5 2023 11:30pm)
No that's not what verifiable means. Not even going to bother explaining, you are the dumbest poster on this sub forum by far that is a fact. Your job is to just bump my thread and try not be too insufferable.
https://i.ibb.co/t4g33Rv/images-31.jpgwhat its really about
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for
we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”Darwin’s Horrid Doubt: Why Monkey Brains Troubled the Great Man of Science
https://medium.com/science-and-philosophy/darwins-horrid-doubt-why-monkey-brains-troubled-the-great-man-of-science-e77c954e9019