d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Election Was Rigged, Trap Was Set, Its Coming
Prev19689699709719721965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 47,262
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 22 2021 12:20am
Quote (SunnyvaleTrailerPark @ Feb 21 2021 07:41pm)
Oof

Crack is hell of a drug.

The one on the left look like she's getting her first Cunnilingus.
The one in the middle look like she's minutes away from dying of aids.
The one on the right look like she's being cast for a role in Twilight 4.


the one on the left is a dude. a recent bogus joe appointment. say anything like that on twiter or agendatube and your accounts will get cancelled.
Member
Posts: 47,262
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 22 2021 12:21am
Quote (kenw @ Feb 21 2021 04:59pm)
Mario Kart > Golf


you should make a poll. :)
Member
Posts: 47,262
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 22 2021 11:08am
lol, still applies, lefties made sure of that.

WHATS IT SAY CHUCK?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/n-D1F3r7hsc/
Member
Posts: 9,499
Joined: Feb 3 2005
Gold: 6,969.69
Warn: 20%
Feb 22 2021 04:13pm
This forum seriously lacks moderation
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 22 2021 04:27pm
This forum seriously lacks moderation
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Feb 22 2021 04:28pm
This forum seriously lacks moderation
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Feb 22 2021 07:16pm
It's coming.



Washington(CNN)The Supreme Court on Monday denied an appeal from Republicans challenging a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision that allowed ballots received up to three days after Election Day to be counted to accommodate challenges by the coronavirus pandemic.

The court's action is the latest sign that the justices have no interest in cases concerning the 2020 election results. Lawyers for Republicans had argued that the state court exceeded its authority and should have let stand an Election Day deadline passed by the state legislature. Democrats responded that the state court was within its authority to protect the right to vote amid a pandemic.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, all conservative members of the court, dissented from Monday's order.


Last October, the justices denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to review the decision on an accelerated basis, the second time the court considered the Pennsylvania issue.


The case arising out of the battleground state has been of keen interest to voting rights experts who want to see if the Supreme Court might put limits on what state courts can do when interpreting their own laws. Before the election, the justices already signaled to federal courts that they should not step in to change rules too close to an election.

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, celebrated the ruling on Facebook, saying the state "had a free and fair election -- that's a fact."

He added: "Thank you to the millions of voters who turned out to make their voices heard and to the election workers and volunteers who served admirably. It's time to move on."

The Republicans behind the challenge acknowledged that they weren't challenging 2020 election results. But they said that the state Supreme Court, in allowing a change to ballot deadlines, usurped the authority of the state legislature.

Lawyer John M. Gore of Jones Day told the justices that the Constitution reserves "a special role" for state legislatures "in setting the rules for federal elections." In the case at hand, they said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court "impermissibly altered election rules that are under the purview of the state legislature."

Lawyers for Pennsylvania Democrats told the justices that the state court's reliance on the state constitution to "make a sensible, modest adjustment of mail-in voting procedures in response to an extraordinary public health crisis and the U.S. Postal Service's self-declared shortcomings" should not raise constitutional concerns.

They also argued that since the dispute concerned the now-concluded 2020 election it has "no enduring significance" and should be considered moot.

In total, the justices on Monday rejected eight cases. Only in the cases brought by Pennsylvania Republicans did some of the justices publicly dissent.

This post was edited by kenw on Feb 22 2021 07:18pm
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Feb 22 2021 07:23pm
This moderation seriously lacks forum
Member
Posts: 47,262
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Feb 22 2021 09:48pm
Quote (kenw @ Feb 22 2021 05:16pm)
It's coming.



Washington(CNN)The Supreme Court on Monday denied an appeal from Republicans challenging a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision that allowed ballots received up to three days after Election Day to be counted to accommodate challenges by the coronavirus pandemic.

The court's action is the latest sign that the justices have no interest in cases concerning the 2020 election results. Lawyers for Republicans had argued that the state court exceeded its authority and should have let stand an Election Day deadline passed by the state legislature. Democrats responded that the state court was within its authority to protect the right to vote amid a pandemic.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, all conservative members of the court, dissented from Monday's order.


Last October, the justices denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to review the decision on an accelerated basis, the second time the court considered the Pennsylvania issue.


The case arising out of the battleground state has been of keen interest to voting rights experts who want to see if the Supreme Court might put limits on what state courts can do when interpreting their own laws. Before the election, the justices already signaled to federal courts that they should not step in to change rules too close to an election.

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, celebrated the ruling on Facebook, saying the state "had a free and fair election -- that's a fact."

He added: "Thank you to the millions of voters who turned out to make their voices heard and to the election workers and volunteers who served admirably. It's time to move on."

The Republicans behind the challenge acknowledged that they weren't challenging 2020 election results. But they said that the state Supreme Court, in allowing a change to ballot deadlines, usurped the authority of the state legislature.

Lawyer John M. Gore of Jones Day told the justices that the Constitution reserves "a special role" for state legislatures "in setting the rules for federal elections." In the case at hand, they said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court "impermissibly altered election rules that are under the purview of the state legislature."

Lawyers for Pennsylvania Democrats told the justices that the state court's reliance on the state constitution to "make a sensible, modest adjustment of mail-in voting procedures in response to an extraordinary public health crisis and the U.S. Postal Service's self-declared shortcomings" should not raise constitutional concerns.

They also argued that since the dispute concerned the now-concluded 2020 election it has "no enduring significance" and should be considered moot.

In total, the justices on Monday rejected eight cases. Only in the cases brought by Pennsylvania Republicans did some of the justices publicly dissent.


"Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, celebrated the ruling on Facebook, saying the state "had a free and fair election -- that's a fact.""
(lol nothing to see here folks :rofl: ) honk honk
Member
Posts: 38,522
Joined: Apr 4 2006
Gold: 1,005.00
Feb 23 2021 04:46am
Dominion Voting Systems filed a $1.3-billion defamation lawsuit Monday against the founder and CEO of Minnesota-based MyPillow, saying that Mike Lindell falsely accused the company of rigging the 2020 presidential election.

The lawsuit filed in federal court in the District of Columbia alleges that Lindell ignored repeated warnings from Dominion, a voting technology company that has filed similar lawsuits against Donald Trump lawyers Rudolph Giuliani and Sidney Powell.

Dominion’s lawsuit accuses Lindell of repeatedly telling what the lawsuit calls the “Big Lie” that the company stole the election.


“No amount of money can repair the damage that’s been done by these lies, which are easily disproved. Hundreds of documented audits and recounts have proven that Dominion machines accurately counted votes. We look forward to proving these facts in a court of law,” the lawsuit says.

Lindell and MyPillow’s general counsel, Doug Wardlow, did not immediately return messages seeking comment Monday.

Lindell, known as the “MyPillow Guy” from his TV commercials, said in an interview with The Associated Press last month that he would not let up on his claims against Dominion. That was before he released a documentary-style video, which Dominion calls “cartoonish,” that repeated and elaborated on his unproven claims.

Lindell told the AP: “You bring it on, Dominion, because I want everybody to see.”
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19689699709719721965Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll