Quote (thesnipa @ 9 Sep 2021 12:29)
analysis ive seen shows that most people who have healthcare now arent looking at a tax thats much if any more than their current plan. the main group affected are the uninsured and young people. and on the same line in a single payer i dont even understand how costs couldnt go down given our gap in what we pay for the exact same services or prescriptions as other first world nations that have socialized healthcare. in short i dont see how we could pay more, it seems unlikely costs would remain the same, and i can see a clear path for it to cost less.
the greatest concern has always been and remains that m4a essentially triples the federal budget overnight, potentially forever throwing the federal/state balance of power into a perilous place.
The primary concern I see is that any time in the US that corporations gain a captive audience, prices go up. When multiple epi pens were mandated for every member of the military, for instance, prices of epi pens rose by... What was it? 20x? The same occurs with PPE, medical equipment, etc. The second problem you'll see if hospitals are run by the state is the complete unionization of all non-MDs. Meaning nurses unions, janitors unions, security unions, etc. They're now public employees capable of unionizing and striking at a moment's notice for any reason they want. They now hold the US Taxpayer hostage.
The other problem is that the US still bars foreign competition in a lot of our pharmaceutical market. So yeah, you buy the $120 Albuterol inhaler in the US, or you can go to Mexico, get the exact same US produced inhaler for $5. This is a near across the board factor. You can buy US Medicines cheaper in nearly every other nation in the world. Why? Either to compete with local producers, or due to mandated prices. AKA, the US Citizen is currently subsidizing US Pharma so that they can make massive profits selling to the rest of the world.
So, where costs floored in other nations that deal heavily with the US medicinal and medical equipment market, the assumption that our prices would reduce to match is kind of naïve. Because all those who produce the products that the healthcare industry need would still be private companies, and not only likely maintain their prices, but raise them further, as they now have the Taxpayers hostage. The secondary concern would be an immediate strike and renegotiation of payrates of all low level employees, further raising costs.
Also, I love how you jump to "incel" talk. Public healthcare means that the healthy pay for the sick. Done. What's that mean? A healthy woman with no kids or healthy kids, no husband or healthy husband, has to pay the costs of sick kids not her own, sick men not her own, and sick women that aren't her. Way to put a further burden on working women, you sexist pig.