Quote (WhiteSouned @ Mar 27 2024 06:42pm)
I was referring to the Palestinian chant “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” as of free from me who occupies it and hence the desire to get rid off (and I’m being gentle here) from whoever they see as their occupier.
The rest of what you wrote is well known here. About Israeli policies up until now the policy was keeping the status quo for the last 50 years. A policy that blew in our face at 10/7.
Currently I’m conflicting between two alternatives. One is a full out total war which ends with the Palestinians relocation to a different country (Egypt, Jordan w/e) and the second is to control whole of Israel (including Gaza and West Bank) , denazify them , rebuild everything and after some time all of them will be Israelis with equal
Rights etc.
There is quite alot in your post so I will deal with them one by one, if you give me the time to edit this post.
1. The chant from the river to the sea, is an Israeli chant as I understand it? Yes Palestinians have adopted their own version of it, but the chant is originally Israeli, or do you dispute this ? The guardian quotes:

Even Benni uses it today, unless this is a misquote:

2. I dont understand this fixation on 10/7. An event similar to 10/7 was inevitable to my mind. The status quo in Israel for the last 50 years and, if continued for the next 50 years, is not sustainable. you cannot brutalize a group of people and not expect consequences. This in no way justifies such events but rather is highlighting that the treatment of palestinians and of non jews living in the westbank, for decades, is deplorable. You are welcome to try to refute this, but saying they are animals, sub human, hamapalestinians or lesser beings does not win the debate.
Relating to your alternatives, and understand (a) I am leaving morals at the door and (b) we had this same discussion at the end of last year when I said something along these lines:
scenario 1: total war, which should include gaza and the westbank, this would create lebensraum throughout israel and is the cleanest solution, albeit not palatable to many people. This, i presume would result in a single jewish state, for jews, with laws earmarked for jews only as anything less will cause issues to emerge in the long term. This WOULD solve the problem.
scenario 2: (i will address the comment of denazify below) this is doomed to fail and is effectively the current situation which in some quarters is suggested as an apartheid regime. Thing will never be the same. Israel has killed approx 32,000 people and probably injured another 90,000 (using 1:3 ratio which is generally accepted). Israel continues to steal, or occupy if you prefer the term, more and more land in the west bank, so even if you quote "denazify them" they will be radicalized by the policies which continue to be implemented (tortured, forced ethnic cleansing of the west bank).
In terms of the expression "denazify" it was by me said last year - Israel does not have the exclusive right to call its enemies nazi's. the simple fact is the west bank, and gaza, are lebensraum. This is a very difficult pill for me to swallow noting my own heritage.

i.e. dont call palestinians nazi's, as your living in a glass house and the same accusation can be thrown back with a crap tonne of supporting evidence / documents / video's.
This post was edited by ferdia on Mar 27 2024 01:05pm