No, I'm going to keep ignoring irrelevant bullshit and keep advocating for people with shitty, destructive opinions that could lead to people's actual deaths to face consequences.

Sitting around peacefully respecting people's rights to discuss destroying entire populations has worked out poorly and I have zero problem with people fighting back against it. Advocating genocide IS violence.

This post was edited by AiNedeSpelCzech on Jan 22 2017 02:41am

here I gotta agree. violence doesnt need to by physical. there is also psychological and ideational violence. talking about genocide like it was a viable option, a legitimate course of action, is without a doubt ideational violence, is poisoning the minds of the gullible.

Recognizing facts = "irrelevant bullshit"

Supporting violence against speech = tolerance

Opinions = genocide

Pointing out attacking innocent children isn't tolerant and supporting free speech = too stupid to be taken seriously


Have anything else despicable and ridiculous to say or are you about done?

Do you have a time limit of when its acceptable to physically assault someone who said something you didnt like? Or is it unlimited?
Hes fair game until he dies?

Do you just not care about established American precedents and rights or whats the deal? The fact that there is no likely or imminent danger and no direct threats doesnt matter to you?
Someone merely asking the wrong questions at some point in time is justification for violence and murder in your eyes?
Do you even realize that it WASNT richard spencer who wrote that article?
My feelings were hurt, so kill people? What a guy. Such tolerance.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jan 22 2017 03:06am

Furthermore have you actually read the article in question before advocating violence against someone who didn't even write it?

Did you know Spencer had the article removed from the website?
Do you understand that the questions were actually being used as a literary device highlighting what was being said about white people in South Africa and to make a point about how debates are framed? and was not actually calling for black genocide?

Or are you perfectly content to read a snippet out of context and delude yourself into believing you are righteous and informed?

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jan 22 2017 03:24am

My bad, he only provides a platform for advocating genocide and then took it down, gee, what a good guy. He's definitely not advocated other dangerous shot like mobilizing against the local Jews and whatnot.

What is this bullshit about a kid? I literally honestly don't even know what this irrelevant overemotional has to do with fuck all.

But seriously 'just asking the wrong questions' fucking lol. I can't reply to that disingenuous bullshit properly without getting ten percent thx

Go back and read the posts directly preceding my post about the tolerant left. There is a link to twitter with a video of a kid who had just been attacked.

I guess you are going with a yes to this question
and a dodge to the others.
Stay trashy.

I'm willing to go with someone who published that trash being as forty as someone who wrote it.

I'm also willing to call you an overemotional child who can't really debate for having to keep insisting I'm okay with everyone getting punched because I'm okay with one dude getting punched.

That snippet was what I provided to PaRD, it was far from all I know of the dude, and I'm not than happy to say that he's dangerous and has advocated note than enough violence to have earned that punch.

Anyway, glad to see you're so triggered because a literal white supremacist got punched, it really lets us know where your priorities lie.

He's talking about a different video. One where a kid with an American flag hat has been roughed up and is claiming it was anti-trump protesters who did it.

It is awkward to work out what cambo was talking about though tbh as he doesn't bother quoting the post he's replying to.

I figured it out eventually, though I still can't work out the overemotional mental gymnastics that mean that a public racist eugenicist who calls for a white state being punched means I'm okay with every punch ever thrown.