d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Mueller Report
Prev19394959697173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 19 2019 01:20pm
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Apr 19 2019 02:14pm
Democrats celebrating their booby prize i see
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 19 2019 02:42pm
Regarding USA i have 2 things in my news:

- "Why Donald Trump is not exonerated by the Mueller report"
- "Turpin family"
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Apr 19 2019 04:24pm
I've finished almost all of Volume I. If you followed the investigation closely, you already knew most of it. Still remarkable to read when you get to see all the claims together. Anybody who says this investigation was started because of political actors is an idiot.

Also... how the fuck did Erik Prince escape charges for lying to Congress?

There really aren't many redactions... mostly just the Roger Stone case. I'm kind of surprised by that. There's some grand jury redactions that I'd like to see... but it doesn't seem like there's any new bombshells behind them. There are some interesting details that I don't think were public before on Mifsud, Kilimnik, and even some exculpatory details on the Trump crowd.

I don't understand why Manafort lied about his contacts with Kilimnik. It just doesn't make sense. And why was Trump floating pardons to people who weren't covering up a conspiracy?

If Mueller couldn't find coordination, I don't think it existed.

I'll read Volume II tomorrow sometime to see how our criminal president acted.
Member
Posts: 50,903
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Apr 19 2019 06:11pm
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-decline-barrs-offer-to-view-a-less-redacted-mueller-report/?ftag=CNM-00-10aag7e

The democrats have refused Barr's offer to allow top committee members to view the Mueller Report without the few non-grand jury redactions, and instead are brainlessly doubling down on their subpoena threat
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Apr 19 2019 06:12pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 19 Apr 2019 20:11)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-decline-barrs-offer-to-view-a-less-redacted-mueller-report/?ftag=CNM-00-10aag7e

The democrats have refused Barr's offer to allow top committee members to view the Mueller Report without the few non-grand jury redactions, and instead are brainlessly doubling down on their subpoena threat



:rofl:
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Apr 19 2019 06:35pm
Womp

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Apr 19 2019 06:35pm
Member
Posts: 105,146
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Apr 19 2019 06:48pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 19 2019 08:11pm)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-decline-barrs-offer-to-view-a-less-redacted-mueller-report/?ftag=CNM-00-10aag7e

The democrats have refused Barr's offer to allow top committee members to view the Mueller Report without the few non-grand jury redactions, and instead are brainlessly doubling down on their subpoena threat



Quote
"Attorney General Barr has given unprecedented accommodations to Chairman Nadler, and it's unconscionable the chairman refuses receipt of information he's claimed for weeks Democrats are 'entitled to.' Who subpoenas a report and publicly refuses to read it in the same day?" a spokesperson for House Judiciary Republicans said in a statement.




Oooh, I know. The party that wants to use the redacted information and the media to sway the opinions of the general public. General public that is NOT qualified to comprehend the information.
If I were the right in this instance, I would make it very clear to the general public, that the left is attempting to USE them by interpreting the redacted information incorrectly and then claiming that they have done the general public a favor.

By way of example we already saw what the left did with the Kavanaugh information and how they tried to sway the public with false information.






/e









This post was edited by Ghot on Apr 19 2019 06:56pm
Member
Posts: 105,146
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Apr 20 2019 02:54am










Member
Posts: 3,007
Joined: Mar 15 2019
Gold: 35.00
Warn: 20%
Apr 20 2019 03:21am
Quote (IceMage @ Apr 19 2019 06:24pm)
I've finished almost all of Volume I. If you followed the investigation closely, you already knew most of it. Still remarkable to read when you get to see all the claims together. Anybody who says this investigation was started because of political actors is an idiot.

Also... how the fuck did Erik Prince escape charges for lying to Congress?

There really aren't many redactions... mostly just the Roger Stone case. I'm kind of surprised by that. There's some grand jury redactions that I'd like to see... but it doesn't seem like there's any new bombshells behind them. There are some interesting details that I don't think were public before on Mifsud, Kilimnik, and even some exculpatory details on the Trump crowd.

I don't understand why Manafort lied about his contacts with Kilimnik. It just doesn't make sense. And why was Trump floating pardons to people who weren't covering up a conspiracy?

If Mueller couldn't find coordination, I don't think it existed.

I'll read Volume II tomorrow sometime to see how our criminal president acted.


well long story short is it's another distraction while they take over the world
centralize power and streamline consciousness to conform to the will of the empire
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19394959697173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll