Quote (InsaneBobb @ Jan 7 2021 12:09pm)
The discussion was who Thor wants arrested and for what. He specifically stated: "Anybody who touched an official or staffer's office or personal affects." We're well past misdemeanor trespass here. We're talking about going out, after the fact, and arresting people. And 2018 was an active session as well. I'm not advocating for those people to suddenly be rearrested and charged with something. Congress did what they decided to do, which was hold the session until later at night. When protestors were told to get out, it's bedtime, they got. As you posted earlier, they have the right to determine what's done in DC. They decided to postpone the session.
You're trying to conflate two different discussions, mate. And in a really stupid way.
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Jan 7 2021 11:42am)
But isn't the claim that every single person no matter what they did should be arrested?
I mean, if your claim is that anyone who smashed a window or attacked a police officer should be arrested, in general, we agree. What about the other thousands of people? To be blunt, there were videos and photos all over the place. It should be easy to track down anyone who was anything other than peaceful and nab them up. Is that enough, or are you out for blood in a way you weren't when the... Protestors... Were something you agreed with?
You dodged the question. Again. Who do you want arrested? Those who were carrying weapons were already arrested. Who else? Not down to engage further until you answer a basic question. Not even about right and wrong or arguing a point. You stated:
Before we discuss the merits of constitutionally questionable misdemeanors any further, let's get a straight up answer. Or just admit you were talking out your ass and we'll proceed from there.
Edit: oops, fail edit. Sorry for the partial double. :(
u cant even follow along lol.
u asked me who i want arrested. i answer and u say it was to thor.
just scroll up so u dont look pathetic.
tl;dr of the bobbashing that happened today:
1. bobb says "this was legal, because im an expert on public property"
2. snipa says "no it isnt, its very basically no legal, at all"
3. bobb says "there are zero laws saying this is illegal"
4. snipa googles, for literally like 1 second, and finds 1 of thousands of laws
5. bobb says "well that may be the law, but before when i said the law is the law i meant the constitution, not the law, and also here are a list of conspiracy theories on why the SCOTUS hasnt shot that law down even though i said they easily could"
6. snipa says "ummmmm trespassing exists"
7. bobb asks "ok but who do u want arrested"
8. snipa says "literally all trespassers yesterday and forever"
9. bobb says "i wasnt asking you"
next time just naruto into the building with the rest of the idiots who use constitution 10x a day in conversation but dont understand it so a federal agent can dispose of your ignorant opinions and save me the time.