d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Senate Impeachment Trial 2020
Prev19293949596134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 3 2020 03:25pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 3 Feb 2020 22:15)
Because left and right in US politics are political alignments, not ideologies. There is no ideological consistency across the left or right, and indeed there are rather contradictory political alliances between conflicting ideologies, like having Linda Sarsour head the Women's March or having isolationist libertarians and warmongering neocons in the same republican cabinet. As it stands, Islam in America is virtually 100% politically aligned with the left, the democrats, the progressives and other left-wing groups. Between black nationalist islam like Farrakhan and arab / north african migrants, muslims are as hardcore left-wing aligned as they could possibly be. There's a reason that Ilhan Omar makes such impassioned apologetic speeches defending islamic terrorists while far-right groups want to wage another crusade. There's a reason liberals are open to banning depictions of the prophet mohamed by cartoonists but the right wing harps on about free speech.

You may not like it, you may not understand it, but Islamists are firmly in the left wing camp, just like neo-Nazis are in the right wing.
When mainstream republicans denounce their radicals, it doesn't mean that neo-Nazis aren't right wing anymore. They're clearly aligned with the right-wing of US politics. Same that even if/when democrats denounce islamic terrorism, they're still aligned. The good democrats make clear that they don't want to be associated with the fundamentalist islamists, but those democrats seem to get fewer and farther between. Very few will openly condemn the extremists anymore, for fear of being labeled islamophobic. Which is also how we wound up with Linda Sarsour heading the Women's March.



the kill count from antifa is low but still significant, depends on how you define the grey cases where ideology is uncertain or no explicit connections but clearly identical ideology
the kill count from black supremacists is pretty high, especially looking back decades
the kill count from islamists dwarfs everything else.


more proof you're totally NOT joking, just a right wing hack trying to attribute the killings of islamists to 'the left', when every serious statistic lists them as their own category. exactly what i assumed. i'm sure snipa will now admit that i was right, and we can all laugh about what a joke you are...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States

This post was edited by fender on Feb 3 2020 03:29pm
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Feb 3 2020 03:34pm
Quote (fender @ Feb 3 2020 03:25pm)
more proof you're totally NOT joking, just a right wing hack trying to attribute the killings of islamists to 'the left', when every serious statistic lists them as their own category. exactly what i assumed. i'm sure snipa will now admit that i was right, and we can all laugh about what a joke you are...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States


Quote (thesnipa @ Feb 3 2020 02:55pm)
antifa have an almost non existent body count, that was clue one. lumping islamists in with "the left" was clue two. he's being hyperbolic, not literal. even black supremacists have a very low kill count, clue three.

and i was being only a bit more literal with my examples as goom was with his.

the point remains, islamists are leftist in the american context in a binary choice. which is really all that is needed for a joke to be born.

but im sure that Goom will take the opportunity to write up a 3 page response to you passionately arguing for something that was honestly just a joke to begin with.


AND for reference:


Quote (fender @ Feb 3 2020 01:50pm)


Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 3 2020 01:52pm)
Antifa, black supremacists and islamists combined? I can't count that high.


even put in the "i cant count that high". im not sure how many signals a 2 sentence post can even have that it's not literal lol.

ok enough buzzkilling for one day. goodbye pard
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Feb 3 2020 03:46pm
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255a.html

no really, I have no inclination to count that high
I could maybe sum up the number of antifa deaths but it takes some extrapolation and secondary sources, but I CBA to count islamists, white supremacists, black nationalists, etc.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Feb 3 2020 03:48pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 3 2020 04:24pm)
Well you wouldn't be the first to notice the similarities between the tea party era republicans and sjw era democrats, but I do think the democrats long, long since passed the high water mark of the republicans.


Is just interesting seeing a bunch of dude's that talked all that shit about identity politics doubling down and embracing identity politics so thoroughly.

A Testament of how successful identity politics is in democracy.

The tea party are the same dudes are supporting trump right now. All evangelicals pray around them and talk in tongues for him. Its wild. They think he is going to save the white race.


Quote (fender @ Feb 3 2020 04:25pm)
more proof you're totally NOT joking, just a right wing hack trying to attribute the killings of islamists to 'the left', when every serious statistic lists them as their own category. exactly what i assumed. i'm sure snipa will now admit that i was right, and we can all laugh about what a joke you are...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_the_United_States


He is not equating Islamic killings to the left. Hes not stupid or calling us stupid.

Men fighting a holy war to establish natural law is a very conservative ideology. When the actual Islamic revolutions happened they were mainly competing against the marxism. The Islamist purged the left from their countries a long time ago.

/e he trolling lol

This post was edited by Skinned on Feb 3 2020 03:56pm
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Feb 3 2020 04:05pm
Quote (Skinned @ Feb 3 2020 03:48pm)
Is just interesting seeing a bunch of dude's that talked all that shit about identity politics doubling down and embracing identity politics so thoroughly.
A Testament of how successful identity politics is in democracy.
The tea party are the same dues are supporting trump right now. All evangelicals bray around them and talk in tongues for him. Its wild. They think he is going to save the white race.


There's a big distinction between saying the same tea party guys are supporting Trump now and saying that Trump's supporters are the same as the tea party guys. Ideologically its a pretty wide valley, but the Republicans have pitched their big tent and kept pretty cohesive despite Trump representing a wild divergence from the tea party caucus. Maybe more in similar than apart, but lord knows Trump is no champion of fiscal responsibility and not suckling at the Koch brother's mammon teat. They do have the same guns, flags and funny hats though. The right-wing populist nationalists and right-wing fiscal conservatives / social conservatives have some issues in common, some opposed. All those evangelicals are braying around him knowing he spent his life as a pro-life democrat who personally paid for who knows how many abortions for his mistresses, they don't care as long as he's willing to play ball with them.

Quote
He is not equating Islamic killings to the left. Hes not stupid or calling us stupid.

Men fighting a holy war to establish natural law is a very conservative ideology. When the actual Islamic revolutions happened they were mainly competing against the marxism. The Islamist purged the left from their countries a long time ago.

/e he trolling lol


You should tell all the democrats that and get them to divorce the islamists from the democratic party and progressive movements and see how that goes.
As far as US politics are concerned, islamists are in a virtual 100% alignment with the left. Ideological differences have been no barrier there. Its not always the case worldwide, its not always the case historically. Political alliances not built on ideology are pretty easy to change.

To give an example; a New York State Senator released a proposed bill a couple weeks ago that would make it a crime for social media platforms to not immediately take down cartoons of the prophet mohamed, fining them up to $1 million per post if the pictures weren't taken down within 24 hours and they could demonstrate 'a pattern of not removing hate speech.' Which party do you think he belong to?

If you want to know which party is embracing islamists and which is rejecting them, gee lets think, Donald Trump campaigned on a Muslim Ban. Hillary Clinton campaigned in a hijab.



This post was edited by Goomshill on Feb 3 2020 04:06pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 3 2020 04:14pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 3 Feb 2020 22:34)
AND for reference:






even put in the "i cant count that high". im not sure how many signals a 2 sentence post can even have that it's not literal lol.

ok enough buzzkilling for one day. goodbye pard


so you maintain your narrative that goom is just 'joking', despite his repeated attempts to justify that idiotic narrative? yeah, i think this is just another case of you not being able to admit you're wrong, rather than goon-shill suddenly turning from hardcore propagandist into a comedian.

Quote (Goomshill @ 3 Feb 2020 22:46)
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255a.html

no really, I have no inclination to count that high
I could maybe sum up the number of antifa deaths but it takes some extrapolation and secondary sources, but I CBA to count islamists, white supremacists, black nationalists, etc.


notice how 'islamist' is its own category? just like 'right' and 'left'...
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Feb 3 2020 04:23pm
Quote (fender @ Feb 3 2020 04:14pm)
notice how 'islamist' is its own category? just like 'right' and 'left'...


and notice how "nationalist" and "unabomber" and "beltway sniper" and "religious" are their own categories?
that's just someone trying to create coherent, readable statistics, not spelling out political alignments with any coherence. Its also missing a ton of attacks and mislabels a few. Its just a resource, one reasonably decent list. Plane crash with unknown motive labeled as islamist, which it may have been, may have not. Antifa gunman kills 9 people and we don't know if it was politically motivated for sure or not? Shows up as "CRI?".

Besides, that list goes so far back you can't possibly align decades or centuries old terrorist incidents into contemporary left/right partisan affiliations. I mean, I feel reasonably confident in saying Leon Czolgosz would be considered "Antifa" in the present day, but what was considered left then, bears little resemblance to what is considered left now. Making that classification not carry much meaning.

This post was edited by Goomshill on Feb 3 2020 04:25pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 3 2020 04:26pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Feb 3 2020 01:08pm)
How about we live in 2020 and deal with problems that currently exist in our culture instead of pretending its still the 1890s or 1940s? The difference is that Antifa is out there committing terrorism in the present day and turning out large mobs, whereas the KKK are a defunct organization that can't fill up a high school gymnasium and half the people who show up are undercover feds.

We've got actually active groups of antifa, black supremacists and islamists on the left committing terrorist attacks, and white supremacists and neo-nazis on the right committing terrorist attacks.
One political party endorses and associates openly with their aligned extremist groups, the other rejects and disavows them.


lol dude, Trump went on Alex Jones' show. If you think nobody in the GOP courts the anti-jewish crazies on their side of the aisle you're hopelessly ignorant.

Also, there's a huge ideological difference between Antifa and the KKK. The KKK is a unified group with leadership dedicated to removing specific races from America. Antifa is a loosely associated group dedicated to removing an ideology that we all agree is bad. Antifa has some bad apples, but they aren't anywhere near the same league of badness either in realized damages or ideological damage that the antisemitic groups you are referencing have achieved.

I get it, there's really no groups on the left that you can point at and say "look, we all agree there's nothing redeemable there" like there are on the right so you have to invent one.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Feb 3 2020 04:27pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Feb 3 2020 04:44pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 3 Feb 2020 23:23)
and notice how "nationalist" and "unabomber" and "beltway sniper" and "religious" are their own categories?
that's just someone trying to create coherent, readable statistics, not spelling out political alignments with any coherence. Its also missing a ton of attacks and mislabels a few. Its just a resource, one reasonably decent list. Plane crash with unknown motive labeled as islamist, which it may have been, may have not. Antifa gunman kills 9 people and we don't know if it was politically motivated for sure or not? Shows up as "CRI?".

Besides, that list goes so far back you can't possibly align decades or centuries old terrorist incidents into contemporary left/right partisan affiliations. I mean, I feel reasonably confident in saying Leon Czolgosz would be considered "Antifa" in the present day, but what was considered left then, bears little resemblance to what is considered left now. Making that classification not carry much meaning.


ok, then please show me a source that lumps in islamist terrorist attacks with 'the left'.

Quote (Thor123422 @ 3 Feb 2020 23:26)
lol dude, Trump went on Alex Jones' show. If you think nobody in the GOP courts the anti-jewish crazies on their side of the aisle you're hopelessly ignorant.

Also, there's a huge ideological difference between Antifa and the KKK. The KKK is a unified group with leadership dedicated to removing specific races from America. Antifa is a loosely associated group dedicated to removing an ideology that we all agree is bad. Antifa has some bad apples, but they aren't anywhere near the same league of badness either in realized damages or ideological damage that the antisemitic groups you are referencing have achieved.

I get it, there's really no groups on the left that you can point at and say "look, we all agree there's nothing redeemable there" like there are on the right so you have to invent one.


not just that - he also awarded press credentials to staunchly anti-semitic "TruNews", repeatedly invited them to major events, and had them platformed when the white house still had press briefings:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/26/business/media/trunews-white-house-press-credentials.html



but hey, the REAL anti-semites are leftists who dare to criticise israel for their illegal occupation of the palestinians...
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Feb 3 2020 04:50pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Feb 3 2020 04:26pm)
lol dude, Trump went on Alex Jones' show. If you think nobody in the GOP courts the anti-jewish crazies on their side of the aisle you're hopelessly ignorant.


Alex Jones, anti-semitic?
That's like calling Bill Cosby a pedophile.

Quote
Also, there's a huge ideological difference between Antifa and the KKK. The KKK is a unified group with leadership dedicated to removing specific races from America. Antifa is a loosely associated group dedicated to removing an ideology that we all agree is bad. Antifa has some bad apples, but they aren't anywhere near the same league of badness either in realized damages or ideological damage that the antisemitic groups you are referencing have achieved.


So I'm trying to understand for the purposes of this thread, which "KKK" are we talking about? I was pointing out how its a historical relic that only existed decades ago and what passes for the KKK today couldn't fill a high school gymnasium and would be at least half undercovers. But if we're talking about the present day KKK, then its very much not a unified group and shares the same loosely associated cell structure with antifa. There's dozens of KKK "groups" around the country, each with something like 2-5 members.

Once a group has numerous terrorist shootings and bombings under its belt, I don't think comparing numbers in a vacuum changes any moral or political calculus. Should we rest easy that 'most' Antifa terrorist attacks were failures that just got the gunman killed, or that the ones with multiple fatalities aren't for sure politically motivated? I think once a group is radicalized enough that people are committing suicide bomb attacks while pledging themselves to a political/religious cause, it should be treated seriously.

Quote
I get it, there's really no groups on the left that you can point at and say "look, we all agree there's nothing redeemable there" like there are on the right so you have to invent one.


I have no problem pointing at communists and saying that.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19293949596134Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll