Donald Trump = The Little Guy?

lol

He's a 1%er

Warren is a racist job stealer to boot.

For my own education, when people talk about the 1%ers, are they generally talking about income, networth, some equation modifying networth for age, or something else?

This post was edited by RzChaos on Oct 19 2016 05:22pm

Wow, this is really dumb

they're talking about the RULERS OF THE ENTIRE WORLD

I was referring to this statement, where you say Clinton's 2nd place record low likability doesn't count for some reason, while Trump's does.



Clinton's just is not in line with our "climate" at all. She's disliked because people dislike her specifically. It doesn't take a genius to see that even anecdotally.



How on Earth does Bernie Sanders not apply here? He nearly beat Clinton in the primary. His name recognition is enormous. You know likability would not have dropped to anywhere near Clinton's if he was the nominee, if at all.



But the poll was a poll of who specific political party members support wasn't it? What does the sampling size matter? I'm assuming they either didn't include combined numbers of all parties, or if they did that they adjusted the numbers to the actual number of people in each party in the state using the ratios for each party.

If they were to actually sample Democrats disproportionately to the population and release combined numbers without adjusting them, it'd be an enormous scandal and they'd lose credibility forever.



"Big guys" means corporations, I assume. The politicians rig the system for the corporations and rich elite. Doesn't really sound like she meant the elections are rigged.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 19 2016 09:58pm

no that data is just to verify the oversampling and part of a bigger poll. They gave hillary a lead of 3 in a state that is normally R+5 by oversampling democrats to D+34. They made Hillary look like she is winning by oversampling democrats by a ludicrous amount and they have done this several times in several other polls. This is why people say the polls are rigged.

even though I disagree with Bernie on principle I do think Bernie would have been a better candidate because Hillary is completely corrupt

This post was edited by majorblood on Oct 19 2016 10:00pm

Can you link me to it so I can see? That's horrible if true.

(for reference, the actual betting odds for Arizona are currently at about 57% Clinton 43% Trump... how much does that differ from the poll?)

Also apparently there's some new independent guy named Evan McMullin who's got better odds than both Johnson and Stein lol.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 19 2016 10:01pm

Yeah there's nothing wrong with this. They adjusted it like I said. Read the paragraph right above the red text.

If they didn't adjust it it'd be 25.9% Trump 51.3% Clinton.

I guess I shouldn't have expected much from a guy who plays a retard for fame and money. "Trump has a 100% chance of winning the election"

This post was edited by Voyaging on Oct 19 2016 10:44pm