d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > October Invasion Of Israel
Prev19209219229239241672Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.92
Warn: 10%
Feb 24 2024 03:01am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 24 2024 02:39am)
The AP worked with Hamas, they're working with Hezbollah, they've worked with the PA, they worked with the White Helmets, they worked with ISIS. How is it they always seem to be working with the enemy? Why are they always on-hand at the very beginning of these attacks?

The Associated Press's main defense, in ALL of these cases, is that these so-called journalists are "contract workers" and not "real employees". The problem, as I see it, is that they've been working actively with the enemy, had foreknowledge of hundreds of attacks over the past decade or two, and rather than reporting their knowledge of the attacks so that massacres could be avoided, they profited off the footage of the massacres.

I'd say that Israelis who were maimed and crippled during October 7th are going to need a lifetime of care and assistance, which is brutally expensive. It's poetic justice that the AP should have to pay for it. And would be even better if they were formally recognized as enemy combatants as well.


Lmao go outside weirdo
Member
Posts: 20,044
Joined: Apr 13 2016
Gold: 32,397.50
Feb 24 2024 03:07am
Quote (El1te @ Feb 22 2024 11:20pm)
There is a compromise on what to do about the terrorist's children, but people are so brainwashed in this day and age that they dare not speak it.

Letting the children go is obviously not an option, as it simply leads to Hamas 2.0 in 8 years who are more radical and pissed off than the previous generation. This is why Hamas exists in the first place: historic weakness by Israel in allowing the enemies children to run amok. Congratulations idiots, now you got 1,200 citizens massacred and raped!

Euthanizing the children is an okay option, but it is inefficient and leaves psychic harm on those who carry out the act. Historically this was solved by using an executioner who had the mental fortitude to carry this out as a day job, but there are too many for 1 executioner to take care of by himself.

The best option by far is to enslave the children and spay/neuter them. You keep them under strict control, you house them and feed them, they get to stay alive and engage in meaningful work for the rest of their lives in repayment of their debt to Israel. Win-win for every party


Never go full Stalin bro.
Member
Posts: 18,135
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 24 2024 03:30am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ 24 Feb 2024 11:07)
Never go full Stalin bro.


I dont understand what he wants Israel to do.
But I definitely think education needs to be controlled by some sort of western country or else we get the same rapists and murderous population again.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 24 2024 03:31am
Quote (Prox1m1ty @ 24 Feb 2024 02:07)
Never go full Stalin bro.


Several years back there was a case in Alabama, where a few guys brutally raped some drunk white bimbo. Beat the hell out of her, all three took turns raping every orifice, then they capped it off by pissing and shitting on her. There were multiple racial slurs used against her. The 3 rapists were black. The guy filming it was white. The guy filming it got the same charges, and the same sentence as the rapists. But he didn't rape her, he didn't beat her, he didn't urinate or defecate on her. All he was doing was documenting what was happening. why would he be charged? He was basically doing the work of a journalist, right? Hell, his filming of the event provided a huge portion of the evidence for the case. Shouldn't they have thanked him?

Or is it more likely, that he could have stopped the rape, or at least cut it short. He could have alerted authorities, rather than sending the video to others. He could have done any number of things. What did he choose to do? Be a willing accomplice in a felony crime.

The insistence that "journalists" can be part of the staging of major attacks against a nation, know what's going on, fail to alert the authorities, attack after attack, and they're anything other than enemy accomplices, is outright bizarre.

A journalist wants to interview leaders of Hamas? By all means. Leaders of Hezbollah, the Taliban, Ukraine, Russia, the US, or anyone at all on Earth? That's great! That's part of their job description. When, however, the so-called journalist is actively taking part in the invasion of a sovereign nation, such as on October 7th, had foreknowledge of the event, and spread the videos of the event around, riling up SUPPORT for Hamas, what else are they than enemy combatants? Seriously?

Quote (Many_Names @ 24 Feb 2024 02:30)
I dont understand what he wants Israel to do.
But I definitely think education needs to be controlled by some sort of western country or else we get the same rapists and murderous population again.


I want Israel to do not only what they're doing, but to start taking it seriously. Their proposed course of action makes sense. However, are they willing to take over the primary education systems in Gaza so that jihad will no longer be taught to children? Are they willing to monitor all the Mosques to insure batshit crazy Imams aren't riling up jihadist support?

You see all these pro-Islam pro-Marxist posters in PARD who've DEFENDED the actions of Gaza, who've attempted to minimize it, and have even BLAMED your nation for being attacked. How and/or why would their opinions matter to you. Israel built a wall around it's nation, Israel built walls around their major cities. Israel built the Iron Dome all in an effort to NOT have to fight, and yet all it has done is caused the enemies of Israel to come up with new and more improved ways of killing you.

So, I like what I'm seeing so far. But Israel very much needs to decide what it's willing to allow regarding so-called "journalists" in Gaza. Because those "journalists" will always portray Israel as some form of dictator state, all enemies of Israel as poor abused victims, and continuing to allow them to work with your enemies to the point of arriving WITH your enemies to record them slaughtering you seems like a self-defeating act.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Feb 24 2024 03:44am
Member
Posts: 9,164
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Feb 24 2024 06:22am
Quote (Many_Names @ Feb 24 2024 02:50am)
It wasnt the AP it was from the phone of the rape victim


Y'all implying AP published that when you reply back on AP story with that?
Member
Posts: 5,377
Joined: Feb 5 2022
Gold: 2,200.11
Feb 24 2024 06:26am
Escalation? Or more fear mongering?

Iran may already have five nuclear bombs and may have as many as a dozen by May. Some intelligence estimates, as early as this past October, asserted that Iran could have enough enriched weapons-grade uranium for one bomb within a week and enough for five nuclear bombs within six weeks. It has been more than three months since those estimates were made.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/feb/19/does-iran-already-have-nuclear-weapons/

Member
Posts: 50,979
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Feb 24 2024 06:34am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Feb 24 2024 03:31am)
Several years back there was a case in Alabama, where a few guys brutally raped some drunk white bimbo. Beat the hell out of her, all three took turns raping every orifice, then they capped it off by pissing and shitting on her. There were multiple racial slurs used against her. The 3 rapists were black. The guy filming it was white. The guy filming it got the same charges, and the same sentence as the rapists. But he didn't rape her, he didn't beat her, he didn't urinate or defecate on her. All he was doing was documenting what was happening. why would he be charged? He was basically doing the work of a journalist, right? Hell, his filming of the event provided a huge portion of the evidence for the case. Shouldn't they have thanked him?

Or is it more likely, that he could have stopped the rape, or at least cut it short. He could have alerted authorities, rather than sending the video to others. He could have done any number of things. What did he choose to do? Be a willing accomplice in a felony crime.

The insistence that "journalists" can be part of the staging of major attacks against a nation, know what's going on, fail to alert the authorities, attack after attack, and they're anything other than enemy accomplices, is outright bizarre.

A journalist wants to interview leaders of Hamas? By all means. Leaders of Hezbollah, the Taliban, Ukraine, Russia, the US, or anyone at all on Earth? That's great! That's part of their job description. When, however, the so-called journalist is actively taking part in the invasion of a sovereign nation, such as on October 7th, had foreknowledge of the event, and spread the videos of the event around, riling up SUPPORT for Hamas, what else are they than enemy combatants? Seriously?


Gonna go with GRRM on this one;
>"Aye, I did, but I took no part. I was only the watcher, I swear it . . ."
>"Lord Umber," said Robb, "this one was only the watcher. Hang him last, so he may watch the others die.
Member
Posts: 18,135
Joined: Dec 3 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 24 2024 07:47am
Quote (RedFromWinter @ 24 Feb 2024 14:22)
Y'all implying AP published that when you reply back on AP story with that?


I didnt say anything about AP.
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Feb 24 2024 08:01am
Quote (Many_Names @ 24 Feb 2024 06:47)
I didnt say anything about AP.


He's confusing what was posted about embedded AP assets within Hamas and the cellphone footage you brought up.

Keeping in mind, two of these "AP Journalists" have been killed for being part of attacks since October, it's an attempt to delegitimize Israel further.

Know your enemy.
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Feb 24 2024 08:37am
Quote (zorzin @ Feb 23 2024 09:54pm)


no more deals with these lunatics
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev19209219229239241672Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll