Right Wing terrorist drove a car into a group of antifa in Charlottesville and you guys scapegoat mental illness or some shit. Right Wing terrorism is a real threat and you're worried about rights of some people to take away the rights of others.

And the antifa activist who tried to burn down an ICE facility while armed with a rifle near Seattle last fall, was he a real threat?

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/briannasacks/ice-detention-attack-killed-washington-antifa-manifesto

so how many people have they killed, as opposed to people motivated by right wing motives?

https://ctc.usma.edu/el-paso-terrorist-attack-chain-reaction-global-right-wing-terror/
https://www.businessinsider.com/extremist-killings-links-right-wing-extremism-report-2019-1?r=DE&IR=T

ooops!

Antifa, black supremacists and islamists combined? I can't count that high.

The democratic impeachment managers, on the other hand, have the real priorities in mind.

how are islamist terror attacks 'left'?! pretty sure they are ultra conservative religious fanatics. you people keep clutching your pearls over antifa, when right wing domestic terrorists have killed infinitely more people. you're hacks - you couldn't give a shit about the actual threat domestic terrorism poses, you're just trying (and failing) to score political points, and it backfires every single time when you look at the actual FACTS.

boy that is a hell of a stretch there my dude.

both Palestinians and the Zionists they fight against are conservative religious fanatics. maybe u should tell them they're the same group so they can stop fighting. you might even jump Trump in line for the nobel peace prize.

wait what now? the only 'stretch' here is your interpretation of my post. i'm not at all saying they are 'the same group', that's ridiculous - what i'm saying is they are conservative religious fanatics, i am refuting goon-shill's ridiculous attempt to count islamic terrorist as 'left wing'.
when we're talking about domestic terrorism in america, i would say islamist terrorism is its own category - but i'm not the one who tried to just sneak them in to a political side in order to increase their body count in the first place.

Who is softer on Islamic terrorism in the USA? conservatives who tried to ban the entire region of the Middle East (minus the saudis, mmmm oil money) or the party that blocked them? is is the party who started a war against them or the party that was against the war? was it the party who created illegal monitoring programs to track them in the USA or the party that didnt create those? is it the party that gets mad at kneeling for the flag or the party where a prominent member described 9-11 as "some people did some things"?

if u want to talk about interpretations start with you interpreting that Goom means the islamists themselves are leftists, rather than the support (or more realistically a lowered level of condemnation) of them.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Feb 3 2020 02:36pm

The Democratic Party collectively lost their minds with Trump's election. You could taste the entitlement. How dare they vote against the neo-liberal socially left orthodoxy? Don't they know they're on the wrong side of history? This wasn't how the election was supposed to go!

And so instead of doing the autopsy required to identify how a terrible candidate and poor message led to a relatively routine electoral defeat, the left has spent the last few years trying to invalidate the 2016 election and force from office a president who serves as a daily reminder of their emotional malaise.

And so we end up here with you calling me a fascist before you jump into another thread and talk about how much you'd like to punch some poor guy in the face. And I'm the one who lacks insight?