Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 19 2019 09:40am)

i ALWAYS get you with the stealth inb4 edit. every time.

i know what you're going to say before you even type it. before I even type my post.

there's a geyser in Yellowstone that's harder to read than you.

Quote (Ghot @ Apr 19 2019 07:46am)

Obviously it still hasn't sunken in... Ok I'll try with crayons...

You know those people that are say a democrat for all their lives? I don't do that. Whoever has the best platform I go with them. The side I go with might not have ALL the things in their platform that I agree with, BUT...since after one side is elected, I no longer get a vote on each issue, the side I happen to be on I defend to the hilt. Even if they are trying to get something I don't like passed.

Like I said twice now, and will repeat again... just because you erroneously label that as being a centrist, doesn't mean you are correct.

Silly me, I thought this was a Mueller topic.

Quote

/e Think you MIGHT be able to 'get with the program'?

Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 19 2019 05:49am)

redaction + standard procedure = a really poor argument to me.

redaction have been inappropriately used in high profile cases for decades. they're used to protect people then once they die their actions are brought to light. 70s-80s drug war documents have slews of information redacted that poses zero threat to anything except the person's ego.

redaction are a good thing, when used to protect national security or our foreign allies. they're a bad thing when they're used to protect egos.

centrism isn't all it's cracked up to be, i'm in favor of the documents being released entirely except for national security redaction, AND i expect the dems will make a circus of the contents for years. it's hard having moral stances that aren't tinted red or blue.



you've spent years lambasting lack of transparency and have called out corrupt politicians as well.

watching you default into "everything is fine" mode is always fun tho. we all know your spine has less uses that Christopher Reeves' did.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 19 2019 08:15am)

Lol consistency is a bad argument, okay.

It’s a investigation about spying. I’m all for revealing more rather than less but I wish we would demand the same level of transparency for various things our govt does both domestically and abroad.

Quote (EndlessSky @ Apr 18 2019 10:35pm)

He has a history of being an overzealous prosecutor

Go eat shit

Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 19 2019 08:53am)

Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 19 2019 09:53am)

Quote (EndlessSky @ Apr 19 2019 09:57am)

:wacko:

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/372769-dershowitz-muellers-not-partisan-but-can-be-an-overzealous-prosecutor

Seriously learn to google

Quote

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz said Wednesday on Fox News that special council Robert Mueller isn't partisan but can be an "overzealous prosecutor."

"I know Bob Mueller. I've known him for years and years and years. He is fair," Dershowitz told Fox anchor Sandra Smith on "America's Newsroom."

"He sometimes is thought of as overzealous," he said. "I don’t think he's partisan. I don't think he cares whether he prosecutes Democrats or Republicans, but I think he is very, very tough and sometimes can be an overzealous prosecutor."

Quote (EndlessSky @ Apr 19 2019 07:57am)

:wacko:

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/372769-dershowitz-muellers-not-partisan-but-can-be-an-overzealous-prosecutor

Seriously learn to google