d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1908909910911912983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
May 11 2021 01:56pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 11 2021 03:39pm)
Typical cam. someone says something, you respond with the "yeah thats what u said but what you meant was this and it was to downplay this and elevate that". then they say, no that's not what i was doing. and you write another paragraph telling people what they think.

if you only actually responded to what was posted your overly dense wordblocks might be halfway to decent. you're as bad as fender most days with the telling people what they think.


I see you are not ready to honestly represent and address what was said. Just gossiping about me like a bitch.

I clearly explained my reasoning and why it was relevant.
Do you have an argument?
Member
Posts: 92,959
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 11 2021 02:00pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ May 11 2021 02:56pm)
I see you are not ready to honestly represent and address what was said. Just gossiping about me like a bitch.

I clearly explained my reasoning and why it was relevant.
Do you have an argument?


ofthevoid: A mob stormed a building for a few hours then left. Pretty much a typical BLM protest

surf: five people died

how many BLM protests can u link where 5 people died, let alone is that typical?

see cam? do u see? that's how easy it is to make you look stupid, even for a bitch like me.

Quote (Surfpunk @ May 11 2021 03:06pm)
No, you did what you rail against other people for doing to you - perceived what was said in a way you wanted, then tried to use that alternate perception to attack the other person.

Fuck outta here with that bullshit.


"I see you are not ready to honestly represent and address what was said" he said, while not honestly representing and addressing what was said.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 11 2021 02:09pm
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 11 2021 02:06pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ May 11 2021 02:37pm)
Its directly relevant to the point and the center of the debate.

"wow, embarrassing" if you cant see that.



'wrong' is not an argument.

The implication and how it was used were purposefully omitting key facts in order to dishonestly push a prevalent false narrative.

Someone dying from a heart attack somewhere around there does nothing to refute what ofthevoid said or support the idea of violent insurrection.
I brought up critical information that neutered the point you brought up.

'How dare you say its so dramatic, five people died!' and 'a guy died from a heart attack while he was there' are radically different pictures.


No, you did what you rail against other people for doing to you - perceived what was said in a way you wanted, then tried to use that alternate perception to attack the other person.

Fuck outta here with that bullshit.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
May 11 2021 02:10pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 11 2021 04:00pm)
ofthevoid: A mob stormed a building for a few hours then left. Pretty much a typical BLM protest

surf: five people died

how many BLM protests can u link where 5 people died, let alone is that typical?

see cam? do u see? that's how easy it is to make you look stupid, even for a bitch like me.


Omitting literally everything I said does not make me look stupid.

Skinned claimed republicans tried to overthrow the government in his typically manipulative and hyperbolic fashion.

ofthevoid said that was dramatic and said this:
Quote
So dramatic. A mob stormed a building for a few hours then left. Pretty much a typical BLM protest. Previous generations tell us about some great events, storming the beach in Normandy, MLK speeches, etc, while you betas will site Drumpf.


some guy dying from a heart attack somewhere around there does literally nothing to support the idea of an overthrow, nor does it make it any more violent than a BLM event.

The fact that it was a heart attack and not a murder is supremely relevant, not irrelevant as the two of you falsely claimed.


Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
May 11 2021 02:13pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ May 11 2021 04:06pm)
No, you did what you rail against other people for doing to you - perceived what was said in a way you wanted, then tried to use that alternate perception to attack the other person.

Fuck outta here with that bullshit.


Being offended I brought up relevant information that undermined what you said is not an argument.

Did I 'attack' you? call the cops.

The fact that it was a heart attack and not a murder continues to be critically relevant no matter how upset you get that I brought it up and no matter how many times you want to make a false equivalency.
Member
Posts: 92,959
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 11 2021 02:15pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ May 11 2021 03:10pm)
Omitting literally everything I said does not make me look stupid.

Skinned claimed republicans tried to overthrow the government in his typically manipulative and hyperbolic fashion.

ofthevoid said that was dramatic and said this:


some guy dying from a heart attack somewhere around there does literally nothing to support the idea of an overthrow, nor does it make it any more violent than a BLM event.

The fact that it was a heart attack and not a murder is supremely relevant, not irrelevant as the two of you falsely claimed.


its almost like skinned and surfpunk arent the same person. and surfpunk was responding to ofthevoid, without referencing what skinned said.

of said it was like a typical BLM protest, surfpunk pointed out people died, unlike what happens in typical BLM protests.

then mindreader Cam came along. thank god.

its funny u lean on 1 of the 5 cases tho. congrats on being 20% worth listening to.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 11 2021 02:16pm
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 11 2021 02:17pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ May 11 2021 03:13pm)
Being offended I brought up relevant information that undermined what you said is not an argument.

Did I 'attack' you? call the cops.

The fact that it was a heart attack and not a murder continues to be critically relevant no matter how upset you get that I brought it up and no matter how many times you want to make a false equivalency.


Upset? Offended? LOOOOOOOOOOL

You're here falsely assigning meaning to a statement due to your own perceptions of said statement, when you rail against the same tactic being used against you in this forum.

InB4 another "I correctly said X, which obliterates your sub-80 IQ Y" retort.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
May 11 2021 02:18pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 11 2021 04:15pm)
its almost like skinned and surfpunk arent the same person. and surfpunk was responding to ofthevoid, without referencing what skinned said.

of said it was like a typical BLM protest, surfpunk pointed out people died, unlike what happens in typical BLM protests.

then mindreader Cam came along. thank god.


Yes lets strip the posts of all context to make it more convenient for you. /s

Surfpunk's entire post reads: "five people died"

My response "How did they die?"

You two: OMG THATS IRRELVANT

great job guys. keep it up.

Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 11 2021 02:20pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ May 11 2021 03:18pm)
Yes lets strip the posts of all context to make it more convenient for you. /s

Surfpunk's entire post reads: "five people died"

My response "How did they die?"

You two: OMG THATS IRRELVANT

great job guys. keep it up.


Jeebus, you can't even avoid cherry-picking your own post.

Quote (cambovenzi @ May 11 2021 02:12pm)
And? How did they die?

Only one person was killed. An unarmed woman murdered by police.


This post was edited by Surfpunk on May 11 2021 02:21pm
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
May 11 2021 02:24pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ May 11 2021 04:20pm)
Jeebus, you can't even avoid cherry-picking your own post.


Would you like to explain how that part of the paraphrased post fundamentally alters anything here?

Both sections are talking about cause of death, which is relevant. Both to what you said and to the larger context of the discussion.

Its ok to admit you were wrong.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1908909910911912983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll