Once again I won’t let you defame me.

I have never defended anyone here and I have no allegiance to one party or another. All I’ve seen from you is a refusal to acknowledge that sexual abuse is a crime so serious that it should bypass your political bias. You remain silent about 1 side while I’ll gladly denounce both.

more than simply remaining silent, he was caught covering up for a confessed anti-White racist mass murderer

fender (to magat who called the business owners that got firebombed "groomers"): what's your definition of "groomer"? what makes them "groomers"? here is an ACTUAL groomer, and he's a republican running for office.

chainsaw: b-b-but both parties do it

fender: foh with your bothsidesism. dems purge their sex pests, republicans endorse them

chainsaw: b-b-but joe biden likes to sniff hair

fender: joe biden is a creep. fuck him. still not as bad as being a regular on epstein's paedo island, ogling naked teens, and raping women

chainsaw:b-b-but both sides

fender: yes, but not equally

chainsaw: b-b-but you never admit dems do it, both parties are bad

fender: learn to read, i explicitly said yes, but that doesn't make them EQUALLY bad. happens more often on the republican side, and they tend to rally behind their sex pests.

.
.
.

the whole conversation is in this thread. you got triggered by me asking why the business owners were called "groomers" and providing an example of an ACTUAL groomer. so you had to jump in and try to defend the GQP groomer by baselessly suggesting that both parties were equally bad. that's absurd, you're just a republican hack. a defender of groomers and paedos. disgusting.

This post was edited by fender on Nov 4 2022 08:17pm

If that’s what you got from the conversation I feel truly sorry for you. Re-read my previous post again. The bold part is simply another lie again. My first post was saying no one here is defending pedophiles, I never even mentioned the donut shop owner or what YeeHaw said - I pointed out that you were quick to provide an exemple of a republican pedo as a way to dismiss allegations against someone from your party. From there you went on saying that repulicans are worse, as if it made any allegations against a democrat non-important.

This post was edited by Chainsaw47 on Nov 4 2022 08:35pm

whatever you have to tell yourself, groomer apologist. fact is some magat made a completely baseless claim in order to justify the firebombing, i provided a REAL case of "grooming", and that got you triggered into oblivion - because unsurprisingly the REAL groomer is a fellow conservative of yours.

being the hack that you are, you then proceded to draw false equivalences between hair sniffers and rapists, between a party that purges prominent members like al franken for slightly inappropriate photos, and a party that endorses child molesters like roy moore for senate. no, those parties are not the same - not even close...

YOU chose to defend GQP groomers, paedos, and rapists - i didn't make you do any of that, so stop clutching your pearls already.

IF there is an actual, credible allegation against a democrat, i'll be the first person to denounce them. there wasn't though. the accusation made here was a baseless claim against some random business owners (not democrat lawmakers - you just can't stop lying, huh?) in order to defend another criminal, the firebomber.

if you don't want to come across as hyper partisan republican hack, maybe try some nuance and honesty for a change?

the people, who push the sexualisation of school kids, gender change, puberty blockers, drag queens and other absurdities, call others pedophiles......rofl

the people, who push the sexualisation of school kids, gender change, puberty blockers, drag queens and other absurdities, call others pedophiles......rofl

Once again, a big wall of lies and misrepresentation of the conversation we’ve had. If you have anything truthful you’d wish to add, go ahead.

Once again, a big wall of lies and misrepresentation of the conversation we’ve had. If you have anything truthful you’d wish to add, go ahead.

Calling me a maggot is extremely unbecoming sir. If you want an example of grooming please refer to this business’ Facebook page.


Sexually grooming children is introducing them to explicitly sexualized material or situations in an attempt to normalize it. They will, at an extremely young age (in this particular case the children looked to be five or six years old) be conscious of sexual concepts, and it will become a part of their learning process as they begin to understand the world.