Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Oct 23 2022 07:34pm)
The 1960's had more leaders than MLK, and MLK was an active socialist who was white washed to hell. Plenty of other leaders said things like what Ibram did. Malcolm X argued for black power, black autonomy, and black self defense specifically. King wanted everybody from the working class to be liberated from capitalism and for all downtrodden to be lifted up, but blacks would be lifted up more because they had been discriminated against more so they had further to lift.
You're still putting forward a very white washed version of the 1960's. It's not totally your fault. Those in power wanted a black guy to put in history books who's message they could turn into "stay in line and don't disrupt too much and you'll get your way". So they platformed King posthumously, did their best to eliminate all the inconvenient hings he wanted, and pushed down other leaders of the time.
Let's agree that in certain cases the civil rights movements were disruptive, certainly not always though. That's still beside the point, because the two movements are nothing alike. A movement being disruptive to achieve it's goals can be warranted in a case of obvious oppression, like there was pre-civil rights with blacks, or India with the British colonizers, or in other colonies, we can dig up enough examples. In pretty much all of these there is an inherent oppressed vs oppressor, poor vs rich, majority vs minority, etc line of delineation. That's not the case with the anti-oil movement of today. The people perpetrating these disruptions are not the poor, not the underclass but rather middle and upper class white young people. Their disruptive behavior is actually anti-poor people because even if lite versions of their asks would be implemented you'd have mass starvation first in the half the globe that's black, brown and poor and eventually everywhere else. It's an inherent privileged and bourgeoisie position, one that comes from a very insulated living. The pleb of the world, whether you go to Asia, Africa, South America isn't thinking about these ideas, and in many cases does not support these positions because they would literally die if they'd be implemented.