d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Biological Men Should Not Compete In Women's Sport
Prev18910111218Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 14 2022 10:22am
Quote (SunnyvaleTrailerPark @ Apr 14 2022 09:20am)
Isn't that hermaphrodite in a sense? If not, no idea of the wording.


I think netflix's argument is that the presence of hermaphrodites is "proof" that sex is a spectrum.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 14 2022 10:24am
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 14 2022 11:11am)
isnt the core of this entire issue the expansion of trans rights? sports gets headlines, as do silly ineffectual laws in southern states that amount to nothing. but there are still very real questions about not only legal rights, but also if we as a society should brand people with very negative labels based on their level of acceptance of trans narratives around trans identity. on a more topical level should we tell all public school children that dont understand statistics about trans identity even though only 1/100,000 or w/e people are trans, or should we let councilors try and identify people who are trans and handle these issues behind closed doors.

pendulums rarely swing from bigotry to dead center, i dont think we've gotten into lala land in most cases, but the resistance to that swing isn't entirely bigoted ben shapiro fanboys either.


The propensity for being trans is far higher than 1/100,000. Once we stop actively discriminating, I suspect it's going to get as high as one or two percent.

The real issue is that well-meaning centrists are eating propaganda from ben shapiro types who's only real agenda is cruelty. As a result you get people who have never met a trans person suddenly caring very deeply about how unfair it is, even though they never touched womens sports and have no clue to what extent the issue exists.
Member
Posts: 11,344
Joined: Jul 2 2019
Gold: 2,170.00
Apr 14 2022 10:25am
Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 14 2022 05:22pm)
I think netflix's argument is that the presence of hermaphrodites is "proof" that sex is a spectrum.


anything that had or has a dick /= woman
Member
Posts: 10,525
Joined: Feb 9 2022
Gold: 425.70
Apr 14 2022 10:29am
Boys have penises

Girls have vaginas


It’s that simple

No girls don’t have penises
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
Apr 14 2022 10:31am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 14 2022 12:24pm)
The propensity for being trans is far higher than 1/100,000. Once we stop actively discriminating, I suspect it's going to get as high as one or two percent.

The real issue is that well-meaning centrists are eating propaganda from ben shapiro types who's only real agenda is cruelty. As a result you get people who have never met a trans person suddenly caring very deeply about how unfair it is, even though they never touched womens sports and have no clue to what extent the issue exists.


I actually know a trans that went F to M. What i like bout said person is that "He" live a normal life without begging for shit. The one that annoys me are the vocal one who want the whole world to bend over to them. When you realize a body/what your eyes see means nothing and the only that count is what you are inside, you stop giving a fuck bout those things.

The vocal one in any brackets are the one that need to stfu and live .
Member
Posts: 28,880
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Apr 14 2022 10:31am
Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 14 2022 12:16pm)
It's on the outer edge of a Bell curve distribution to be sure, but it's enough of a sample to be considered part of a spectrum, even if the classical M/F group makes up the vast majority of it.


It's not even in the same galaxy as the outer edge. If this happened with rates of like 1 per 1000 we can talk about it maybe, but this has a rate ranging from .5 to 5 per 100,000. So we're going to toss out the binary reality that represents 99.99995% of people because of .00005%?

And once again, this is isn't happening because there has been some sort of new discovery in scientific thinking. Like Snipa said, it's a semantic point, a precursor to try and force acceptance of nonsensical societal pressures.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Apr 14 2022 10:33am
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 14 2022 10:33am
Quote (JessiWan @ Apr 14 2022 11:22am)
I think netflix's argument is that the presence of hermaphrodites is "proof" that sex is a spectrum.


Sex and gender, in typical parlance, are words that represent a cluster of characteristics. Men can be feminine and women can be manly. This only became controversial when a certain group wanted to be cruel to trans people.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 14 2022 10:35am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 14 2022 11:31am)
It's not even in the same galaxy as the outer edge. If this happened with rates of like 1 per 1000 we can talk about it maybe, but this has a rate ranging from .5 to 5 per 100,000. So we're going to toss out the binary reality that represents 99.99995% of people because of .00005%?

And once again, this is isn't happening because there has been some sort of new discovery in scientific thinking. Like Snipa said, it's a semantic point, a precursor to try and force acceptance of nonsensical societal pressures.


I thought you took basic statistics lol

It's a classic bimodal distribution.
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Apr 14 2022 10:40am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 14 2022 09:33am)
Sex and gender, in typical parlance, are words that represent a cluster of characteristics. Men can be feminine and women can be manly. This only became controversial when a certain group wanted to be cruel to trans people.


Nobody is trying to be cruel to trans. We just don't think we need to bend over backwards to cater to their whim, or in the case of women's sports, loosen the definition of woman just so that trans women can feel included.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 14 2022 10:40am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 14 2022 11:31am)
It's not even in the same galaxy as the outer edge. If this happened with rates of like 1 per 1000 we can talk about it maybe, but this has a rate ranging from .5 to 5 per 100,000. So we're going to toss out the binary reality that represents 99.99995% of people because of .00005%?

And once again, this is isn't happening because there has been some sort of new discovery in scientific thinking. Like Snipa said, it's a semantic point, a precursor to try and force acceptance of nonsensical societal pressures.


5 out of 100k is JUST AIS. There are a lot of other variations that make that percentage a lot higher than .00005% in total. But yeah, ignore Statistics 101.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev18910111218Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll