that was my response.

behavioral tendencies of both sexes, previously referred to as gender for human history, is based mostly on brain chemistry, not socially constructed norms. the subconscious mind is more formed by biological forces of chemistry than socially constructed inner dialogues of superficial norms. and further the norms themselves are largely a reaction to this brain chemistry, not superficially created.

ive stated the same thing in about 5 ways now from complex to mind numbingly simplistic and asked you to respond then u strawmanned me and acted insulted at the strawman u created lol. when i ask you to get specific, ask for examples of where the line is in your opinion u started to post like a 15 year old who found weed for the first time, "all words are like made up maaaaaaan", "we put stuff in like categories maaaaaan".

nature doesnt make categories? what's a phylum? what's a genus? why can a coyote mate with a fox but not a horse?

Dude cat named Granby. He was fixed, but so was my other dude cat who was the alpha of the house. Granby would try fucking the alpha male cat of the house. Strangest thing.

Classifying things based on what they can mate with is something you do. Nature creates things that can mate with some other things and not mate with others. It's your decision to put those things into boxes and label them based on what they can mate with.

This is like, philosophy 101 level material. Not something you should be so emotionally opposed to accepting.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Mar 31 2022 09:13am

its a cute name but that sure is weird ive never seen solitary animals do that, maybe its like that "prison gayness" that appears in humans

Foucault has a lot to say about taxonomy in The Order of Things. It is a way of categorization based in similitude. Taxonomy used to be based in differences prior to this scientific paradigm.

A phylum didn't exist before some dudes made it up and decided on a collective definition for it.

Just a thought in taxonomy.

This post was edited by Skinned on Mar 31 2022 09:18am

People are acting like taxonomy was just obvious and we didn't have like two thousand years of people thinking "rabbitness" existed somewhere in a perfect dimension

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Mar 31 2022 09:19am

whenever philosophy or emotions enter a scientific field, its not to advance science science needs clear thinking and any obfuscation will just hinder it, not improve it

i understand the need to define things properly, but you were intentionally defining them improperly every definition you gave was incorrect in a small but important way

the issue you're having is continuing to think that im opposed to this sidebar, rather than simply realizing its a sidebar that's not relevant to the science we're speaking of.

next if i ask you which human behaviors are driven by chemical biology and which are driven by social construction you'll tell me that humans decided what a fight was and created the word gossip.



evolutionary taxonomy can still be tracked via DNA study tho. the fact that we thought Pandas were bears for a while doesnt change my point. nature does through evolution create categories, the fact we identify and name them doesnt change that.

Overton window strikes again. I personally find it super cringe that the right wing is now trying to weasel its way into championing feminism when we should be mercilessly trying to crush it into oblivion. When will we learn to stop playing the left's game?

Anyone can be anything.
Love is love.
Anyone can love anyone.
Kiddie love is normal and good.

That is EXACTLY where this is going.
Don't let anyone try to trick you into thinking it isn't.