I bet he gets gangraped on the weekly by his girlfriend's glory hole buddies.

Should i bold the part where it says the ozone hole had low impact DUE TO HUMANS CLOSING IT?
Because you seem to struggle to read your own sources, i mean its LITERALLY in my last post.
The ozone hole was a HUGE issue in 1989, we closed it.. thus it was no longer a huge issue, i do not understand what part you are struggling with?
Had we left the ozone hole ignored we would be seeing meteoric temperature rises.
In 1989 this was the case..

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Feb 9 2022 11:29pm

15 years later they said temperature rises would destroy the world anyway


since 1989 a lot of rich climate change warriors have bought expensive oceanside properties and flown on a lot of private jets while battling climate change

The article was talking about the ozone hole and its impact, like increased cancer risks, sunburn, blindness and all that. However, ozone depletion is not meaningfully linked with global warming.
These impacts (cancer risk etc.) were mitigated due to humans closing the ozone hole; that is what the nasa article was talking about.


This is categorically untrue and the key of your misunderstanding. Also, the nasa article that I linked does not claim anywhere that the ozone hole would be a risk in terms of global warming.

You are just outright lying though.

Ah yes, women. I see the resemblance. Doesn’t look like a psychosis to me at all. I frequently see women who look like this and act like this, thankfully they are educating 8 year olds in school, or would be but they keep protesting having to educate children for their paycheck. Amazing time to be alive huh?